Failed bitcoin exchange Mt Gox gets U.S. bankruptcy protection

Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:44pm EDT

A man walks past a building where Mt. Gox, a digital marketplace operator, is housed in Tokyo February 25, 2014.  REUTERS/Toru Hanai

A man walks past a building where Mt. Gox, a digital marketplace operator, is housed in Tokyo February 25, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Toru Hanai

Related Topics

(Reuters) - The failed Tokyo-based bitcoin exchange, Mt Gox, received court approval on Tuesday to begin Chapter 15 bankruptcy proceedings in the United States as it awaits approval of a settlement with U.S. customers and a sale of its business.

Mt Gox was once the world's leading exchange for trading the digital currency, but shut its website earlier this year after saying it lost some 850,000 bitcoins - worth more than $500 million at current prices - in a hacking attack.

It subsequently said it found 200,000 bitcoins.

The company filed for Chapter 15 bankruptcy protection in March to prevent U.S. customers who had filed a class action lawsuit from seizing its U.S. assets, such as computer servers, and demanding evidence and access to Mt Gox executives.

Since then, the company and the class action plaintiffs reached a settlement, which is awaiting final approval by a federal court in Chicago.

Judge Stacey Jernigan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Dallas granted recognition of the Chapter 15 case, which allows Mt Gox's foreign representative to file lawsuits and pursue potential funds to repay creditors.

Under the deal, U.S. and Canadian customers will split the 200,000 bitcoins held by Mt. Gox and share in a 16.5 percent stake after Mt. Gox is sold.

Sunlot, a firm backed by child actor-turned entrepreneur Brock Pierce and venture capitalist William Quigley, has proposed buying Mt Gox for one bitcoin, or around $600.

The Sunlot deal must be approved by the Tokyo District Court overseeing its bankruptcy.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
kea808 wrote:
Why does a french scam artist running a company in japan have US protection?????

Jun 19, 2014 1:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.