Boeing-Lockheed venture eyes alternate rocket engine by 2019

WASHINGTON Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:13am EDT

An Atlas 5 ULA (United Launch Alliance) rocket carrying a satellite for the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program is launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California April 3, 2014. REUTERS/Gene Blevins

An Atlas 5 ULA (United Launch Alliance) rocket carrying a satellite for the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program is launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California April 3, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Gene Blevins

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The rocket launch company run by Boeing Co and Lockheed Martin Corp on Monday said it had signed contracts with multiple U.S. firms to work on a next-generation rocket engine as an alternative to a Russian engine now used for key launches.

United Launch Alliance (ULA), the joint venture run by the two largest U.S. weapons makers, said it would choose one of the companies to develop a new engine by the fourth quarter, which would enable initial launches by 2019.

The U.S. Defense Department, spurred by growing concerns over Russia's actions in Ukraine, has said it wants to end its dependency on Russian engines to power rockets that launch national security satellites into space.

Controversy about the Russian rocket engine has also put a spotlight on Space Exploration Technologies, a privately held company, that is seeking U.S. Air Force certification so it can compete for some of the U.S. government rocket launches.

SpaceX last month sued the Air Force for excluding it from a multibillion-dollar 36-launch contract awarded to ULA.

ULA said it had signed commercial contracts with multiple firms to investigate next-generation liquid oxygen/hydrocarbon first stage propulsion concepts. It provided no details on the names of the companies involved or the cost.

Aerojet Rocketdyne, a unit of GenCorp, has said it is potentially interested in working on a new engine. It was not immediately clear which other companies might be involved.

ULA said each firm would carry out a technical feasibility analysis, develop plans, identify schedule, cost and technical risks, and cost estimates.

“As the nation’s steward of the launch industrial base and the only company certified to launch our nation’s most critical missions, it is incumbent upon ULA to bring forward the best solutions to preserve that capability for the future,” said Michael Gass, president and chief executive of ULA.

He said the current RD-180 engine, used for the company's Atlas rockets, had been a remarkable success, but it was time to invest in a U.S. engine.

ULA said it would continue to work with U.S.-based RD AMROSS, a joint venture of United Technologies Corp and Russia's NPO Energomash, to study the long-term feasibility of the RD-180 engine in competition with the new engine. 

It said the companies were discussing product improvements, U.S. production of the engine and other enhancements.

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Ken Wills)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
AlkalineState wrote:
“American defense supplier mulls actually doing its job instead of just buying more junk from Russia.”

Boeing = treason. Cut the contracts.

Jun 17, 2014 12:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
willich6 wrote:
SpaceX deserves ALL the credit for getting ULA and the US Air Force off their collective ass and getting them to move on an alternate (non-Russian) engine.
If SpaceX hadn’t sued the Fed Govt over the sole source multi-Billion $ rocket award to ULA (26 Launches at $400M/each), this would NEVER have happened.
Now is the time to infuse competition; cut the current sole source award to the next 10 Launches; Get SpaceX certified Now – not next March; and let them both (ULA and SpaceX) bid competitively for the follow-on 16 Launches in 4 Launch contract increments.. This will cut ULA’s price in HALF… and they know it.
Ask Boeing how much their 767 Tanker price was cut to USAF after competition with AirBus A330…

Jun 17, 2014 12:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Nagant wrote:
So Boeing and Lockheed will choose a company to reinvent the wheel… on tax payer’s dime.

Jun 17, 2014 2:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.