San Francisco to propose tax breaks for urban farms

SACRAMENTO Calif. Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:12pm EDT

Related Topics

SACRAMENTO Calif. (Reuters) - San Francisco would be the first city in California to offer property owners a tax break if they agree to make empty lots available for urban agriculture, under an ordinance to be introduced at the city's Board of Supervisors on Tuesday.

The measure to create an urban agriculture enterprise zone is the latest effort by U.S. cities to turn blighted properties into useful and attractive urban farms and gardens.

“The positives of urban farming go far beyond the production of locally grown, healthy sustainable food,” David Chiu, president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, said in a statement on Monday. “Urban farming improves the environment, grows communities, creates beautiful spaces, increases food security, and advances the health of residents."

The ordinance grows out of legislation passed last year at the state level allowing cities and counties to rezone as farmland any property whose owner agrees to use it solely to grow crops or raise farm animals for at least five years.

When the land is rezoned, its value for tax purposes goes down compared with the sky-high assessments typically imposed on property in expensive cities like San Francisco.

For example, the value of irrigated California farmland in 2012 was $12,000 an acre, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. By comparison, a quarter-acre lot in San Francisco's Richmond District is currently for sale for $4 million, according to the website Land and Farm.

“Our action will help expand access to healthy and fresh food by enabling people to farm in their own neighborhoods," California Assemblyman Phil Ting, whose legislation set up the tax incentive program for cities and counties, said in a statement. "We have a chance to tame the concrete jungle with green spaces that fight blight and provide a local economic boost."

(Reporting by Sharon Bernstein; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
carlice wrote:
Most urban soils are not suitable for vegetable farming or raising live stock because they contain unsafe levels of lead and other industrial toxins. Yet current USDA and EPA regulations permit soils containing lead up to 400 ppm for growing vegetables. Worse, USDA’s Rufus Chaney advocates adding sewage sludge products to this contaminated soil because this supposedly protects children from lead poisoning.( It doesn’t. See ). Therefore tax breaks for urban gardens must include a stipulation that urban-raised meat and vegetables must be grown in such a way that they do not put city children at additional risk from exposure to pollutants. The Sierra Club–with headquarters located in San Francisco– opposes using composts made with industrial waste and sewage sludges. The best guidelines for safe urban gardening can be found in a recently Environmental Health Perspective article:

Jun 17, 2014 11:59am EDT  --  Report as abuse
PaulHughes wrote:
Public land for public food. World’s largest food access project is in Calgary, Alberta and it’s called Grow Calgary. 641 acres of land within the municipal boundary of Calgary. Grow Calgary on facebook and @GrowCalgary on twitter

Jun 17, 2014 2:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.