Japan says had South Korean input on 'comfort women' apology

TOKYO Fri Jun 20, 2014 5:00am EDT

Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga speaks during an interview with Reuters in Tokyo February 15, 2014.   REUTERS/Yuya Shino

Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga speaks during an interview with Reuters in Tokyo February 15, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Yuya Shino

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan got input from South Korea on the sensitive wording of a landmark apology in 1993 to women, many Korean, who worked in Japan's wartime military brothels, an expert panel said after reviewing evidence that led to the statement.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihida Suga, commenting on the report, repeated that Japan would not revise the statement on the "comfort women", as they are euphemistically known in Japan.

"It is still very painful to think of the sufferings that the women endured and there is no change in the government's stance on that," Suga told a news conference.

The topic of "comfort women" has long been a thorn in Japan's ties with South Korea, which says Japan as not sufficiently atoned for the women's suffering.

The 1993 "Kono Statement", named after then-Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono in whose name it was issued, acknowledged Japanese authorities' involvement in coercing the women to work in the brothels.

Many Japanese conservatives, however, say there is no proof of authorities' involvement - a stance adopted by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's first 2006-2007 administration - and that other countries also sexually exploited women during wartime.

Abe has questioned the Kono Statement in the past and in what many saw as a nod to his conservative base, the government asked five experts to review it. But mindful of potential diplomatic fallout, Abe has also said he would not revise it.

Relations between Japan and South Korea have grown frosty in recent years, frayed by a territorial row over a disputed island and by the legacy of Japan's 1910-1945 colonization of the Korean peninsula.


On Friday, South Korea began a shooting drill in disputed waters off the islands, which are controlled by Seoul but also claimed by Tokyo. Japan protested the drill.

China reiterated its view that Japan should face up to its past history of invasion in Asia.

"There is irrefutable evidence for these crimes," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokewoman Hua Chunying told a news briefing.

"Any move which tries to overturn the crimes of history will be unpopular and cannot succeed."

Japan says the matter of compensation for the women forced to work in the brothels was settled under a 1965 treaty establishing diplomatic ties. In 1995, Japan set up a fund to make payments to the women from private contributions, but South Korea says that was not official and so not enough.

While Abe himself has said he was "deeply pained" by the women's suffering, conservative politicians repeatedly cast doubt on Japan's apologies by suggesting Japan has been unfairly singled out or that many of the women were not coerced.

"We have to look into what these documents were originally made from," said Hiroshi Yamada, of the conservative Japan Restoration Party, who originally called for the review.

"If not, then we will simply be told that it is Japan's viewpoint and that it's not what South Korea thinks. The same thing will just happen."

The review of the Kono Statement comes at a delicate time for Abe's security agenda, as he pushes to end a ban on sending Japan's military to aid a friendly country under attack - a major shift in defense policy likely to upset Seoul and Beijing.

(Additional reporting by Ben Blancard in BEIJING; Writing by Linda Sieg in TOKYO; Editing by Jeremy Laurence)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
AtlasMirror wrote:
See what this liar Abe did:

1. Deny Tokyo Trial
2. Deny comfort women
3. Deny WWII war crimes – mass killing, mass raping…..
4. Changing constitution for imperail army return and bring back evil emperor to be head of States.
5. Openly admitted himself an extreme right member in front of UN.
6. Increase military spending even under US protection.
7. Worshipped the ghostly WWII war criminals Shrine as an great insult to all WWII victims. There is no hero there.
8. Keeping the stolen islands that is not belong to Japan which JP needs to return to China after WWII defeat.
9. Changing school text and put incorrect history to school children.
10. Still not repent from WWII compare with Germany which is much much better than Japan.
11. Hiding the nuclear weapon materials which violates the constitution. Now return to US becasue under US pressure.
12. U.S. alarmed about plutonium stockpile growing from Rokkasho plant.
13. Lying to the whole world saying China digital military spending in past years. Compare in 2013 military spending, Japan is 40 % of China and China is 30% of US.
14. Showing Abe is a two faced man. One saying Japan needs to improve China relationship but on the other hand trying to contain China with other countries.
15. Family backgound: Abe is from the famous WWII war criminal family member. His grandfather Kishi ws a key cabinet member of the evil imperial Japan army.

Abe and his ally going to ultranationalist direction making anger of neighbouring countries. In fact, Abe’s objective is to bring back the lost glory of the evil imperial Japan army.

Jun 20, 2014 2:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Americans should read “The Comfort Women” written by C. Sarah Soh of San Francisco State University before you open your mouth and say anything. This is the most precise English account by far I have met. The rest of books ever published were just pulp fiction.

Jun 21, 2014 3:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.