Florida toughens law on hurting fetus, after abortion pill trick

TAMPA Fla. Fri Jun 20, 2014 6:19pm EDT

Related Topics

TAMPA Fla. (Reuters) - Florida Governor Rick Scott on Friday signed into law harsher penalties for crimes in which a fetus is harmed or killed, no matter how early in the pregnancy.

The legislation drew passionate support this spring from a Florida woman whose boyfriend tricked her into taking pills known to induce abortion during the initial weeks of a pregnancy.

The new law allows offenders to be charged with a separate crime for causing harm to a fetus at any stage of development, even if the perpetrator did not know the woman was pregnant.

Prior Florida law applied only in limited circumstances and when the fetus was far enough along to survive outside the womb.

"There is no timeline anymore for justice for an unborn child of a pregnant woman," said the bill's Republican sponsor, state Representative Larry Ahern.

Florida becomes the 38th state allowing a separate charge for the death of a fetus during a crime against the mother, according to a legislative bill analysis. The laws in other states take effect at different developmental stages.

Lobbying for the Florida law's passage this spring was Remee Jo Lee, who lost a pregnancy at nearly seven weeks gestation after her boyfriend gave her pills known to induce abortion, which he put in a bottle labeled as an antibiotic.

Boyfriend John Welden was charged under the federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act. But in a deal with federal prosecutors, he pleaded guilty to lesser charges of tampering with a consumer product resulting in bodily injury and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. He was sentenced to serve more than 13 years in prison.

The new state law would have given Florida prosecutors more options for charging him under state law. But the new law does not affect women choosing to terminate a pregnancy, said Republican state Senator Kelli Stargel, who also sponsored the legislation.

"You're wanting that baby and someone violently takes it from you - it needs to be a crime," she said.

(Reporting by Letitia Stein; Editing by Barbara Goldberg, Eric Beech and David Gregorio)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
ritacanberra wrote:
No matter how early in the pregnancy, when a fetus is harmed or killed, a small unique human being has been unjustly treated.

No matter how early in the pregnancy, both reason and science confirm that the mother’s unborn child is already in existence, being protected and nurtured in her/his mother’s womb.

With astonishing accuracy, we can locate the child within definite co-ordinates of space and time. The child is not a generic, anonymous fetus. We can identify the child’s father, and whether the child is a son or a daughter. We can ascertain long before birth that the child is a unique member of the human family, biologically, genetically, and genealogically.

Equal and inalienable human rights are inherent in our humanity–they pre-exist birth.

It is not age or size or independence that confers human rights, it is just being a human.

This is the irrevocable legal basis of all human rights.

Jun 21, 2014 6:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Laborman wrote:
Trouble is, the Republican anti-abortion platform has no exception for the life of a mother. So it would require the killing of moms in order to save a fertilized egg or fetus. Hopefully those medical choices would be rare. But if it was the law of the land it would have required the killing of my mom in order to save her fetus during a problem pregnancy. Then she’s be dead and my sister would not later have been born. Not exactly “pro-life.”

Jun 21, 2014 8:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ready2013 wrote:
Laborman, both parties are extreme…but I cannot except abortion as a means of birth control…which it has become.

the choice is before the act that causes the condition.

Jun 22, 2014 8:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.