Ukraine crisis forces U.S. to bolster Europe forces

WASHINGTON Fri Jun 20, 2014 5:38pm EDT

A Russian tank crew member runs in front of his T-72B tank after their arrival in Crimea in the settlement of Gvardeiskoye near the Crimean city of Simferopol March 31, 2014. REUTERS/Yannis Behrakis

A Russian tank crew member runs in front of his T-72B tank after their arrival in Crimea in the settlement of Gvardeiskoye near the Crimean city of Simferopol March 31, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Yannis Behrakis

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Only last year, the U.S. European Command was facing some of the deepest cuts of any region in the U.S. military. Now, after Russia's annexation of Crimea, the Pentagon finds itself focusing on the continent in a way not seen in decades.

    Earlier this month, U.S. President Barack Obama said he would ask Congress for an additional $1 billion to increase Washington's military commitment to the continent.

    Last week, the U.S. Air Force said it had deployed two B-2 stealth bombers to England, joining two B-52s sent earlier this month. The two aircraft are America's premier nuclear bombers.

    Washington has sent additional warships to the Black Sea and the Baltic, F-15, F-16 jets and early warning AWACS aircraft to join ramped up NATO patrols near Russian airspace and troops to train in Germany and Eastern Europe.

    With fighting raging in eastern Ukraine between pro-Moscow forces and troops loyal to Kiev, Washington says Russia has put large numbers of troops on the border and may be preparing to deliver tanks and artillery to the separatists.

At a time of budget cuts and when Obama would rather focus its strategic gaze on Asia and the Middle East, resources are limited and few expect America to rebuild the permanent garrison-type presence set up in Europe during the Cold War.    

   While more military supplies will be placed in the European region, U.S. units will be largely rotated through from existing European bases and elsewhere.

    Washington also wants European states to step up more.

    "Collective action doesn't mean the United States puts skin in the game while others stand on the sidelines cheering," U.S. National Security adviser Susan Rice told the annual conference of the Centre for a New American Security.  

    Although the United States has pledged to strengthen the military capabilities of non-NATO states near Russia such as Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, officials say no decisions have been made on details and the real focus is on boosting NATO's defenses.

    In November, U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove, the head of the U.S. European Command, said the force had been told to prepare cuts of up to 20 percent, twice that of some other regions, although a congressional budget deal the following month watered down the cuts in the military as a whole.

    TANKS AND TROOPS

    For now, few military analysts or western officials believe Russian President Vladimir Putin intends to invade any NATO state. 

    Since 2008, Moscow has increased its defense spending some 30 percent. However, Russia's estimated budget of $68 billion annually is dwarfed by Washington's $600 billion and remains smaller than the military spending of Britain, France and Germany combined. 

    Still, the number of forces Moscow can mobilize at speed often outstrips anything the United States or NATO can field, although experts say much Russian equipment remains outdated.

    According to the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, Russia has some 845,000 military personnel, more than 2,500 main battle tanks and thousands of armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles.        

    Shortly before annexing Crimea in March, Moscow mobilized about 150,000 personnel in its western military district.

    The United States has some 67,000 military personnel in Europe, 10,000 of them part of the Stuttgart-based Africa Command (AFRICOM). After the annexation of Crimea, it sent 600 paratroopers from a brigade based in Italy to Poland and the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.      

    Washington has also said it will maintain a presence of some 100 U.S. Army Special Forces in Eastern Europe.

    At the start of the year, the U.S. Army had no tanks in the continent at all, although European NATO states have more than 1,000. As with Russia, some of them are distinctly outdated.

    In January, the U.S. Army moved more than 50 M1A1 Abrams tanks and Bradley armored fighting vehicles into Germany specifically to be used by visiting troops for training.  

   In any emergency, the United States has long pledged several thousand personnel to the NATO Response Force including a brigade combat team from the Texas-based 1st Cavalry Division, a hospital ship, air-to-air refueling tankers and escort ships.   

    The United States sends a smaller battalion-sized unit - roughly one-third the size of a brigade - twice a year for two months for exercises in Europe. So far this year, such groups have been involved in drills in France and Germany - just the kind of deployment the United States believes is likely to become more common.

(Reporting by Peter Apps; Editing by David Storey and Lisa Shumaker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (16)
devildoc68 wrote:
Let drones take out Putin’s tanks and puppets. Someone needs to reel him in and his military is no match for ours. Stuff it up his arse big time and deflate his pathetic ego.

Jun 20, 2014 8:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
devildoc68 wrote:
Let drones take out Putin’s tanks and puppets. Someone needs to reel him in and his military is no match for ours. Stuff it up his arse big time and deflate his pathetic ego.

Jun 20, 2014 8:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bfstk wrote:
The EU and US are spoiling for a fight. We have no business in Ukraine and need to keep our noses out. The last thing the EU needs is to spend more on war armaments or to subsidize the US. The US authorities have gone cuckoo. AS Iraq falls down on their heads after spending 2-3 trillion dollars and the oil they’d carved up for themselves and their friends evaporates the US public has had more than enough war. Cameron in London has gone beserk raising the specter of 9/11 attacks when there is no correlation between what is going in in Iraq and terrorism. Continued warfare and bombing in Iraq will not bring peace or a moments rest. As for English citizens who go abroad to fight wars anywhere legislation can easily strip them of citizenship making them stateless. Ditto for other countries who have a national interest in preventing jihadists or anyone else from picking up arms to fight abroad. So get with Cameron and stop whining.

Jun 20, 2014 9:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.