Stocks slip on Fed official's rate hike call; sterling up

NEW YORK Thu Jun 26, 2014 6:09pm EDT

1 of 2. The curve of the German share price index DAX board, is pictured at the Frankfurt stock exchange June 24, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Remote/Stringer

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended slight lower on Thursday after a Federal Reserve official said interest rates should rise by early 2015, while the pound gained on talk that UK rates also will go up, even as the Bank of England took only mild steps to tighten lending.

The dollar erased gains to trade flat against a basket of major currencies as foreign exchange traders discounted the remarks by the president of the St. Louis Fed, James Bullard. Bullard, in televised comments, said that raising rates by the end of the first quarter in 2015 would be appropriate, based on his forecast that U.S. growth will register 3 percent for the next four quarters.

On Wall Street, six of the 10 S&P 500 sectors finished lower.

"The market is a little bit extended, and we're at the point where there's a little bit of rebalancing going on," said Fred Dickson, chief market strategist at D.A. Davidson & Co, in Lake Oswego, Oregon.

Bullard, a non-voting member of the Fed's policy-setting committee, said in an interview with Fox Business Network that the U.S. jobless rate will fall below 6 percent later this year. Inflation looked likely to rise back to 2 percent, putting the economy closer to normal than most realize, he said.

"I think Bullard caught most people off guard as the Fed meeting was just last week and there was no explicit reading anyone took from there of a Q1 rate hike," said Adam Sarhan, chief executive at New York's Sarhan Capital.

"It's very possible that he's on his own or he might have one other Fed official or a minority within the Fed who thinks we should raise rates sooner rather than later," Sarhan said.

The Dow Jones industrial average .DJI fell 21.38 points or 0.13 percent, to end at 16,846.13. The S&P 500 .SPX slipped 2.31 points, or 0.12 percent, to 1,957.22. The Nasdaq Composite .IXIC dipped 0.71 point, or 0.02 percent, to 4,379.05.

Financial stocks were among the sharpest decliners after a securities fraud lawsuit filed by the New York state attorney general against British bank Barclays (BARC.L). The lawsuit accuses Barclays of giving an unfair edge in the United States to high-frequency trading clients even as it claimed to be protecting other customers from such traders.

U.S.-listed Barclays shares (BCS.N) fell 7.4 percent to $14.55. The bank's London-listed shares ended down 6.5 percent.

U.S. government bond prices rose, with yields on benchmark 10-year Treasuries hitting a three-week low at 2.5322 percent.

Sterling GBP= rose 0.25 percent to $1.7025 as steps announced by the Bank of England to cool the UK housing market failed to dampen expectations the central bank was set to raise rates.

The U.S. dollar index .DXY, which measures the dollar against a basket of six major currencies, was last flat at 80.222. The dollar index erased earlier gains after U.S. data suggested growth was perking up but was not robust enough to give a decisive lift to the dollar.

The FTSEurofirst 300 index .FTEU3 of top European stocks finished down 0.1 percent at 1,370.38 points, dragged lower by the Bullard comments and the lawsuit against Barclays.

In commodities, the spot price of gold XAU= fell 0.2 percent to $1,316.99 an ounce.

In oil, Brent crude LCOc1 finished down 0.7 percent at $113.21 a barrel while U.S. crude CLc1 ended 0.8 percent lower at $105.70 after a bearish turn in the latest U.S. economic data and easing concerns of a supply disruption from the conflict in Iraq.

(Additional reporting by Patrick Graham and Jemima Kelly in London; Editing by Meredith Mazzilli and Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
satori23 wrote:
”The longest and most destructive party ever held is now into its fourth generation, and still no one shows any signs of leaving.

Somebody did once look at his watch, but that was eleven years ago, and there has been no follow-up.

The mess is extraordinary, and has to be seen to be believed, but if you don’t have any particular need to believe it, then don’t go and look, because you won’t enjoy it.

There have recently been some bangs and flashes up in the clouds, and there is one theory that this is a battle being fought between the fleets of several rival carpet-cleaning companies who are hovering over the thing like vultures, but you shouldn’t believe anything you hear at parties, and particularly not anything you hear at this one.

One of the problems, and it’s one which is obviously going to get worse, is that all the people at the party are either the children or the grandchildren or the great-grandchildren of the people who wouldn’t leave in the first place, and because of all the business about selective breeding and regressive genes and so on, it means that all the people now at the party are either absolutely fanatical partygoers, or gibbering idiots, or, more and more frequently, both.

Either way, it means that, genetically speaking, each succeeding generation is now less likely to leave than the preceding one.

So other factors come into operation, like when the drink is going to run out.”

Jun 26, 2014 6:37am EDT  --  Report as abuse
stambo2001 wrote:
“Wednesday’s data on first-quarter U.S. growth also underlined doubts about global growth” – talk about an understatement, the US economy shrank 2.9% in the first quarter. They really, really, really want to blame it on ‘a long winter’ and not Obamacare.

Jun 26, 2014 7:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.