White House defends Obama's pick to lead veterans affairs

WASHINGTON Mon Jun 30, 2014 6:18pm EDT

Former Procter & Gamble Chief Executive Bob McDonald, an Army veteran, listens as U.S. President Barack Obama announces McDonald as his nominee to be the next secretary of veterans affairs at the VA in Washington June 30, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Former Procter & Gamble Chief Executive Bob McDonald, an Army veteran, listens as U.S. President Barack Obama announces McDonald as his nominee to be the next secretary of veterans affairs at the VA in Washington June 30, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House on Monday defended President Barack Obama's choice to lead the troubled Veterans Administration, stressing that the nominee is a seasoned manager and dismissing concerns that he may lack a understanding of issues facing recent war veterans.

Obama announced at the Veterans Administration building that he is nominating Bob McDonald, a former chief executive of Procter & Gamble, to be the next secretary of veterans affairs. Obama called McDonald "one of our nation's most accomplished business leaders and managers."

"We've got to regain the trust of our veterans with a VA that is more effective, more efficient and that truly puts veterans first. Bob is the manager we need to help get this done," Obama said.

McDonald, 61, would succeed Eric Shinseki, who resigned amid a scandal over widespread delays in getting healthcare to veterans.

Unlike Shinseki, McDonald did not spend a career in the military but instead spent 33 years in the corporate world after serving in the Army's 82nd Airborne Division and graduating from the U.S. Military Academy.

Some veterans groups were surprised by the choice and expressed concern that the White House had not discussed McDonald with them in advance.

In addition, some expressed concern that McDonald may not have a contemporary background in the veterans community, which has tried to help veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan cope with devastating injuries, combat suicides and to improve access to mental healthcare.

"He doesn't appear to have had much experience or exposure to Iraq- or Afghanistan-era veterans so that’s something that we hope he gets up to speed on and in the loop as quickly as possible," said Alex Nicholson, legislative director for the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America organization.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest, peppered with questions about McDonald at his daily briefing, said McDonald was chosen because of his record as a solid manager.

"This is somebody who has a lot of experience and has enjoyed a lot of success in managing a large company," Earnest said.

Key senators who will consider McDonald's nomination have not raised any major concerns, suggesting a confirmation process that could be relatively free of fireworks.

In fact, McDonald's history of contributing to Republican political campaigns could end up helping him. The Ohio native contributed to the campaign of Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio, who has endorsed him.

McDonald retired abruptly from P&G a year ago in the midst of a major restructuring at the company.

"He's no-nonsense. He's pragmatic. He does not seek the limelight," Obama said of McDonald.

McDonald vowed to carry out Obama's promise to turn the VA - which a White House report found is mired in chronic failures and suffers from a "corrosive culture" among its employees - into a more efficient operation.

"If confirmed by the Senate, my priority would be to lead that transformation. My life's purpose has been to improve the lives of others," he said.

(Reporting by Steve Holland; Editing by Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Hatsin wrote:
Goooooooooooooooooooooooood luck.

The VA has been a festering wound for a long time. I hope you can at least put some type of band-aid on it.

Jun 30, 2014 6:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
naughtmoses wrote:
Good luck, Bob. Not saying this fella can’t make a difference, but unless he’s allowed to fire at least 5,000 people and run the remainder through something akin to mid-century, Red Chinese thought reform, he’s not going to make a dent. The VHS cult-ure is passive-aggressive here and burned out there. People have tried “culture change” and “bad apple” dumping at the VHS before, but the procedures required to get rid of GS employees are so arduous that few get axed. Sophisticated HR audits have caught this again and again. The better move is to put the VHS on the auction block and sell it off region by region to private operators, put veterans on a single-payer health insurance plan on an improved Medicare model, and allow veterans to select their care providers the same way most people do. (I know, but the current sit for them is worse than Medicare.) BTW, the VHS’s programs for PTSD would be a joke if they weren’t so archaic and inadequate. The state of the art for PTSD treatment is at least 20 years ahead of what the VHS provides right now. RG, Psy.D.

Jun 30, 2014 11:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
euro-yank wrote:
Fingers crossed that an outsider can ‘see the forest for the trees’ that insiders frequently miss (or refuse to see).

For a country that proclaims 100% “support for our troops,” those same Americans when asked to pay taxes to make sure that the veterans are adequately taken care of balk and call themselves “patriot” and supporting “freedom”. We should all be ashamed of ourselves.

Jul 01, 2014 5:47am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus