U.S. privacy board says NSA Internet spying program is effective but worrying

Wed Jul 2, 2014 6:04am EDT

A man types on a computer keyboard in Warsaw in this February 28, 2013 illustration file picture.      REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/Files

A man types on a computer keyboard in Warsaw in this February 28, 2013 illustration file picture.

Credit: Reuters/Kacper Pempel/Files

Related Topics

(Reuters) - The U.S. National Security Agency (NSA)'s data collection program has been an effective tool to enhance the country's security but some elements of the cyber-spying raises privacy concerns, a U.S. federal privacy watchdog said in a report.

Privacy issues have become a hot topic since former NSA contractor Edward Snowden exposed the spy agency's phone and Internet spying programs.

But the program has allowed the government to collect a greater range of foreign intelligence "quickly and effectively," the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board said in a report released on Wednesday.

It added, however, that certain aspects of the program raise questions about whether its impact on U.S. persons pushes it over the edge into "constitutional unreasonableness".

The watchdog said it was concerned about the incidental collection of U.S. persons' communications and the use of queries to search the information collected under the program for the communications of specific U.S. persons.

The program, part of the United States' Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), collects electronic communications, including telephone calls and emails, where the target is a non-U.S. citizen located outside the United States.

The board, set up in 2004, is an independent government agency within the executive branch that advises the U.S. president and Congress on how to ensure that counter-terrorism operations also protect Americans' privacy.

The report was the oversight board's second involving NSA programs. In January the watchdog said that NSA's bulk collection of phone records provides only minimal benefits to countering terrorism, is illegal and should end.

The five-member board also offered several recommendations so that the program could strike a better balance between privacy, civil rights, and national security.

(Reporting by Supriya Kurane in Bangalore, editing by Foo Yun Chee/Jeremy Gaunt)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
sukebe wrote:
This ‘privacy watchdog’ wouldn’t be watchdogging anything if it wern’t for Snowden. So, how valid is their opinion on the matter?

Jul 02, 2014 6:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MassResident wrote:
Police state tactics are effective at protecting the government from its own citizens. They are obviously useless at protecting the public from enemies “foreign or domestic”.

Jul 02, 2014 8:44am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Saros wrote:
“The board, set up in 2004, is an independent government agency within the executive branch”

Been in place for 10 years. While the NSA has been trampling the 4th amendment for at least that long. Very effective oversight board. I’m impressed. NOT.

Jul 02, 2014 9:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.