UPDATE 1-Argentina asks mediator for stay on U.S. court debt ruling

Mon Jul 7, 2014 7:55pm EDT

(Recasts with statements from ministry, mediator)

By Daniel Bases and Sarah Marsh

NEW YORK/BUENOS AIRES, July 7 (Reuters) - Argentina's economy minister on Monday told a mediator in the country's dispute with holdout investors that the U.S. court ruling against the country is "impossible" to fulfill and a stay is necessary in order to reach a solution for all creditors.

The country needs to make a deal with the holdouts who rejected debt restructurings after its 2002 default if it is to avoid a new default just as it struggles with recession and dwindling reserves.

Kicillof spent four hours hashing through the case in New York on Monday with the special master, Daniel Pollack, who was appointed by U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa to find common ground in the years-long dispute.

The minister re-iterated that Argentina could not carry out Griesa's ruling to immediately pay $1.33 billion plus accrued interest to the group of holdouts led by Elliott Management Corp and Aurelius Capital Management, according to a ministry statement.

He also underscored, however, that Argentina was committed to continue negotiating to find a just solution for all creditors. For this purpose, Kicillof had made clear "it was necessary to reinstate the stay given that the case involved not just the litigators but could also be extended to all the creditors who did not join the swaps," the ministry said.

More than seven percent of Argentina's investors did not accept the tough terms of its debt swaps in 2005 and 2010.

Reuters could not reach holdout investors for reaction to the statement.

Kicillof has sealed deals with the Paris Club of creditor nations and Spanish oil major Repsol in the last few months in a bid to attract investment back to Argentina and regain access to global capital markets.

On Monday, he elbowed his way through a gaggle of at least 50 reporters after meeting with Pollack without commenting on the talks, before flying back the same night to Argentina.

Pollack said in a separate statement he had also met with representatives of holdouts last week and both they and Argentina had "indicated an intention to continue meeting."

Argentina attempted to pay bondholders who participated in its debt swaps a regularly scheduled coupon payment due at the end of June, in defiance of Griesa's order that Argentina could not service its restructured debt without paying holdouts.

The judge ordered that the funds deposited at the Bank of New York Mellon's account at the Central Bank of Argentina should be returned to the South American nation.

If a deal is not worked out by July 30 and Argentina does not make a payment it will be considered to have defaulted for a second time in 12 years. (Additional eporting by Alejandro Lifschitz and Jorge Otaola in Buenos Aires and Nate Raymond and Rodrigo Campos in New York; Editing by James Dalgleish, W Simon and Andrew Hay)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
GermanHoldout wrote:
It would be a historic event and come in the historic books, if President Kirchner after 13 years finally finished this HORROR Default with an amicable agreement with the holdouts.

An agreement with the Holdouts would be a win-win situation for everybody!

For Argentina, for the Holdouts and also for the exchange bondholders, whose bonds rates would also be considerably increased.

Already now, with the expectations for an agreement, as we see, borrowing costs are lowering considerable.
A completed final agreement with the Holdouts would improve Argentina’s ratings, initiate a firework of investments and enable also cheaper credits for argentine companies.

Also seizure risks and a technical Default would be immediately averted. Argentina could immediately return to the capital market and thus Argentina could refinance the payments to the holdouts, without using reserves.

FOLLOWING COULD BE THE SOLUTION TO END ARGENTINA’S NIGHTMARE DEFAULT

Under the review of Judge Griesa and Daniel Pollack, Argentina and the Holdouts come together, to end this HORROR-Default, with endless suffering for tens of thousand holdout creditors and their families worldwide.

THE PROCESS COULD BE FOLLOWING:

The “RUFO” clause (Rights Upon Future Offers) expires as of December 2014. That means, that from 01/01/2015 Argentina can make a better offer to the Holdouts, than it made in 2005 and 2010.

Argentina and the holdouts make NOW A BINDING AGREEMENT with respect to the “time after” (end of the “Rights Upon Future Offers (RUFO) clause in December 2014), seizure risks and a technical Default would be immediately averted. Argentina could immediately return to the capital market and thus Argentina could refinance the payments to the holdouts, without using reserves.

In practice the negotiations between Argentina and the Holdouts could look like this:

Argentina enters into good-faith negotiations with the holdout creditors – all of them –via the offices of NML Capital. A firm deadline should be set to reach an agreement, say January 2, 2015, two days after the expiration date of the Rights Upon Future Offers clause.

HOW COULD BE THE CONDITIONS FOR THE REPAYMENT?

Argentina owes to today about 230% to the Holdouts (since 2002 Argentina has not repaid anything to the holdouts)

- at the latest, on 02/01/2015 (end of RUFO clause) Argentina would repay in CASH 100% of the nominal value of the defaulted bonds, which became due before 2015.

- For the accrued interest between 2002-2015 (until now about 130%), Argentina would emit new bonds with a maturity of 5-7 years.

Jul 08, 2014 6:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.