Friend of Boston bomb suspect denies obstructing investigation

BOSTON Mon Jul 7, 2014 2:13pm EDT

A Boston Red Sox hat is seen among a makeshift memorial for the victims of the Boston Marathon bombings on Boylston street in Boston, Massachusetts April 18, 2013.     REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

A Boston Red Sox hat is seen among a makeshift memorial for the victims of the Boston Marathon bombings on Boylston street in Boston, Massachusetts April 18, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

Related Topics

BOSTON (Reuters) - The lawyer for a man charged with obstructing the investigation into the Boston Marathon bombing denied on Monday that his client removed a laptop and backpack containing fireworks from the bombing suspect's dorm room three days after the deadly attack.

Defense attorney Nicholas Wooldridge said in his opening statement that Azamat Tazhayakov took nothing except a pair of headphones that belonged to him from the room of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who is accused of carrying out the April 15, 2013, blasts with his brother.

Tazhayakov is the first of three of Tsarnaev's friends to face trial for hampering the investigation of the bombing and Wooldridge said it was his friend and fellow Kazakh exchange student, Dias Kadyrbayev, who took the laptop from the room and dropped it in a dumpster.

Kadyrbayev was scheduled to be tried on similar charges in September.

Prosecutors contend that Tazhayakov and Kadyrbayev removed items from Tsarnaev's room at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth at his request after the FBI released photos of Tsarnaev and his older brother, Tamerlan, as suspects in the bombing, which killed three people and injured 264.

"Dias is the one that took that bag back to the apartment, not Azamat," Wooldridge said. "Azamat never touched that bag."

Kadyrbayev later dropped the backpack into a dumpster, prosecutors said.

Neither man is charged with a role in the bombing. But prosecutors contended Tazhayakov believed Tsarnaev was the bomber when he went to his dorm room on the night of April 18, 2013.

"When they removed all these things, the defendant thought that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was one of the Boston Marathon bombers," Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephanie Siegmann said in an opening statement.

Tsarnaev told Tazhayakov a month before the bombing that he knew how to build a bomb, Siegmann said.

"Tsarnaev told the defendant and Kadyrbayev that it was good to die as a martyr as you would die with smile on your face and would go straight to heaven," Siegmann said.

Tazhayakov, 20, could face 25 years in prison if convicted of charges of obstruction of justice and conspiracy. He has pleaded not guilty.

Tazhayakov was dressed in a black suit and tie and did not speak at the first day of his trial in U.S. District Court in Boston.

Tsarnaev, 20, is awaiting trial on charges that carry the death penalty if he is convicted. His older brother, Tamerlan, died in a gunbattle with police the night of April 18, 2013, as the two tried to flee Boston. The third friend, Robel Phillipos of Cambridge, Massachusetts, faces the lesser charge of lying to investigators.

Wooldridge urged the jury to remember that Tazhayakov is charged only with obstruction and conspiracy and not focus on emotional reactions to the attack.

"What is this case about? Well I'll tell you what it's not about: The bombing," Wooldridge said. "Don't get shocked and awed. Stay clear and stay focused."

(Reporting by Scott Malone; Editing by Stephen Powell and Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
Bfstk wrote:
Why do lawyers noses grow so large? My choirboy client didn’t do it? It was the Twinkies. Or how about Affluenza from a judge-lawyers. Wow Pinocchio wheretofor art thou?

Jul 07, 2014 2:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
donnyjohnson wrote:
Because we live under a system where the accused does not have to prove that he/she is innocent, rather the State must prove the individual is guilty. We also live under a system where ideally every accused party is afforded compliment legal representation.

These are basic rights under the Constitution and one of the things that Islamist terrorist would like to change under Sharia law. Personally, I like our system much better.

Jul 07, 2014 2:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.