L.A. Dodgers must pay $15 million to baseball fan beaten at stadium

LOS ANGELES Wed Jul 9, 2014 7:42pm EDT

San Francisco Giants fan Bryan Stow is pushed out of a Los Angeles Court in a wheelchair the day before closing arguments in a civil trial in a lawsuit brought by Stow against former Los Angeles Dodgers owner Frank McCourt in Los Angeles, California June 25, 2014.  REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

San Francisco Giants fan Bryan Stow is pushed out of a Los Angeles Court in a wheelchair the day before closing arguments in a civil trial in a lawsuit brought by Stow against former Los Angeles Dodgers owner Frank McCourt in Los Angeles, California June 25, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A jury on Wednesday found the Los Angeles Dodgers negligent in a 2011 assault on a fan at their stadium that left him permanently disabled, ordering the team to pay some $15 million in civil damages but clearing the former club owner of liability.

The Los Angeles Superior Court jury reached its verdict on the ninth day of deliberations over the lawsuit brought by Bryan Stow, a father of two and former paramedic from northern California who was beaten by two men in the Dodger Stadium parking lot after a season-opening game against the San Francisco Giants.

The lawsuit alleged that the Dodgers and Frank McCourt, who was the team's owner at the time, were to blame for lax stadium security that Stow said created an unsafe atmosphere where criminals felt emboldened to prey on others.

But defense attorneys argued that blame lay instead with the two men, Louis Sanchez and Marvin Norwood, who pleaded guilty to criminal charges in the attack and were sentenced to prison terms of eight and four years, respectively.

The jury agreed the two men were mostly responsible for the harm caused to Stow but also found that the Dodgers as a team bore 25 percent of the responsibility.

Under the law, the finding of negligence as a substantial factor in the harm Stow suffered rendered the Dodgers 100 percent liable for $14 million in damages awarded for his economic losses, such as lost earnings and medical bills.

But the Dodgers bear only 25 percent of liability for the additional $4 million awarded for pain and suffering, bringing the total judgment against the team to $15 million.

Stow, 45, who was present in a wheelchair for two days of the trial, was not at the courthouse for the verdict. He had sought more than $37 million for past and future medical care, lost earnings and the college education of his two children.

Still, his parents and lawyers said they were happy with the verdict. "This is a nice nest egg for his family, desperately needed," Stow attorney Thomas Girardi told reporters.

Defense lawyer Dana Fox said no decisions about a possible appeal have been made.

The six men and six women who heard the case had told the judge last week that they were unable to reach a verdict but were ordered to continue deliberating.

In the end they split 9-3 both in favor of finding the Dodgers negligent and of exonerating McCourt, who sold the team to new owners in 2012.

Jurors were unanimous in clearing Stow himself of any negligence in the incident, despite defense claims that he was drunk at the time and may have helped instigate the attack.

(Reporting by Dana Feldman; Writing by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Peter Cooney and Eric Walsh)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
dd606 wrote:
I am in no way condoning what they did to this guy. But… Short of them escorting each guest out with their own security guy, what exactly are they supposed to do? Obviously this is a typical… ‘let’s stick it to the man’ verdict. No weapon was used in the crime, so you can’t say they didn’t catch that. I’ve been to many sporting events, and the truth is… people can be incredibly obnoxious. I once saw a fan of the opposing team at a hockey game, turn around and flip off everybody in the stands for the last 20 seconds of the game. This is a person that then has to walk for blocks in the dark, back to his car… in a city where people are killed for a lot less than that. Bottom line… People don’t just beat a random guy down in a parking lot for no reason.

Jul 09, 2014 6:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
BEANN wrote:
I’ve attended many, many Dodger Games and never saw security in the parking lot or in the building. I saw a main personnel person at the front near the entrance at the beginning of the game and concession stand employees. Very sorry to say this…

Also, dd606–they almost killed the man for a silly game. Stupid.

Jul 09, 2014 7:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
CaptRichie wrote:
This is insane. First the judge says “you can’t go home without a verdict so go back to work”. Then a tired jury goes after the deepest pockets. Stinks. Worse, the precedent here: any business owner is responsible for the criminal act(s) of its customers. Ridiculous. If anything, the City is responsible for their cops not doing their job of protecting the public by not responding in time.

Jul 09, 2014 7:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.