U.S. House Appropriations chair: Obama border security request too high

WASHINGTON Fri Jul 11, 2014 12:25pm EDT

U.S. President Barack Obama pauses while making a statement on the border crisis after his meeting with Texas Governor Rick Perry (not seen) in Dallas July 9, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Barack Obama pauses while making a statement on the border crisis after his meeting with Texas Governor Rick Perry (not seen) in Dallas July 9, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration's $3.7 billion request for emergency funds to bolster U.S. border security and deal with a massive influx of migrant children from Central America is too high and will be reduced, an influential Republican lawmaker said on Friday.

House of Representatives Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers said the amount was "too much money" and a large portion of the funds needed to deal with the problems could be handled through the normal spending bills for the 2015 fiscal year starting on Oct. 1.

He declined to say what he believed was a more appropriate amount and said the committee will produce an estimate soon.

"We're crunching the numbers carefully, I'll hopefully be able to give you a better answer next week," Rogers said.

The $3.7 billion in emergency funds would help pay for temporary detention centers, increased border security and additional immigration court judges to process asylum cases more quickly. Obama administration officials warned lawmakers on Thursday that border security agencies would run out of money this summer if the request was not approved.

Republican U.S. House Speaker John Boehner has said he will wait for recommendations from Rogers before making any decisions about the request.

If these costs are handled through the appropriations bill that funds the Department of Homeland Security, they would be subject to an overall $1.014 trillion cap on discretionary spending, meaning that there would have to be cuts elsewhere.

Emergency appropriations measures, typically for wars or natural disaster relief, do not require offsets and simply add to federal deficits.

The Obama administration also wants to change a 2008 anti-trafficking law requiring deportation proceedings for children that arrive from countries that do not share a border with the United States. This would allow authorities to quickly deport newly arrived children from Central American countries, as they currently are able to do with children arriving from Mexico or Canada.

Rogers said such a change could be handled directly in legislation that contains the approval of emergency funds, adding that the legislation would be approved before a five-week congressional recess that starts on Aug. 1.

"There are immediate needs and emergencies, and that's what we're trying to put together right now. And a lot of what could be spent is contingent on whether we change the '08 law," Rogers said.

He added that the House's emergency spending legislation will contain "substantial border security measures, monies that I think should be accepted well in our House and I would hope, the White House."

(Editing by Doina Chiacu)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (82)
OSU_Aero_Eng wrote:
“The amount is too high.”

So, what is an appropriate amount?

“I don’t know.”

So how did you determine it was too high in the first place? If someone can actually provide an answer, I’d appreciate it. I’m open to the notion that I’m just missing something here.

Jul 11, 2014 11:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
DonD1977 wrote:
“Wait till next week for my offer” means that 70,000+ kids can do without sleeping quarters and meals while the GOP lets them twist in the wind waiting for an “appropriate” budget level? The wait is inexcusable – if there is a surplus it goes back to the Treasury automatically – Rogers is stalling on behalf of boehner, who avoids action and legislation at all costs.

This is what happens when anti-government types are put in charge of government – problems get worse and never get resolved.

Jul 11, 2014 11:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
“We can’t solve this problem that we’re demanding be solved because it costs too much money. We need to be fiscally responsible, and save it for a frivolous lawsuit that will go nowhere, another pointless Benghazi hearing that will tell us the exact opposite of what we’re trying to prove, and our next ACA repeal vote (60th time’s a charm!)”

Jul 11, 2014 12:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.