House backs extending business depreciation tax break

WASHINGTON Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:37pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The House of Representatives voted 258-160 on Friday to extend permanently a business tax break dealing with deductions for depreciating certain capital investments, a move that would cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $287 billion over 10 years.

Known as "bonus depreciation" and now temporary, the tax break lets companies deduct 50 percent of the costs of equipment purchases right away, instead of depreciating the costs over years. That allows them to lower their federal tax costs.

The Republican-drafted House bill, approved with the backing of more than 30 Democrats, will next go to the Democrat-controlled Senate, where it faces an uphill climb.

The White House said on Thursday that if the bill were to win Senate approval and arrive on President Barack Obama's desk, his senior advisers would recommend that he veto it.

The administration criticized the measure because it would expand the federal deficit, adding that bonus depreciation "was never intended to be a permanent corporate giveaway."

Bonus depreciation has traditionally been used as a temporary economic stimulus to encourage businesses to invest in plants and equipment. It was last adopted to help companies recover from the 2007-2008 financial crisis.

It is one 55 temporary tax rules known as extenders, most of which expired at the end of 2013. These are usually renewed retroactively, which analysts expect will happen again after November's congressional elections. Senate Democrats have proposed renewing bonus depreciation through 2016.

The Republican backers of the bill just approved want not only to renew bonus depreciation, but to make it permanent, saying it would spur economic and job growth.

"Making 50 percent bonus depreciation permanent is supported by associations representing ... farmers, telecommunications, manufacturers, energy, construction, retailers and technology," Republican Representative Dave Camp, chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, said in a statement.

"By making long-standing features of the tax code permanent, we can facilitate a comprehensive overhaul of the tax code."

The bonus depreciation bill has no accompanying proposal for raising new government revenue to offset its costs, which Republicans have sometimes demanded for any tax changes.


Representative Sander Levin, the committee's top Democrat and also from Michigan, said making bonus depreciation permanent detracts from its short-term stimulatory impact.

"Bonus depreciation ... allows companies to write off investments more quickly than normal, providing them an incentive to make capital investments now rather than later," Levin said. "That incentive actually disappears when the provision is made permanent."

He questioned the Republican bill for contradicting a comprehensive tax reform plan released by Camp in February that called for eliminating bonus depreciation. "I’m amazed at the inconsistency of this position. It was five months ago ... that they proposed to eliminate this provision entirely," Levin said.

The loophole-riddled U.S. tax code has not been thoroughly overhauled since 1986, during the Reagan administration. Camp's tax reform plan was bold, but corporate lobbyists attacked it, defending their interests, and the plan gained little support.

(Reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh; Editing by James Dalgleish, Jonathan Oatis and Dan Grebler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (8)
diluded001 wrote:
How would the House Republicans suggest we offset the revenue shortfall?

I don’t really like those “shut down the government” Tea Party nut jobs, but this isn’t a bad idea. I would like to see it tied to equipment procured from domestic sources, so we don’t give tax breaks for buying Chinese machines. And in reality, the value of new equipment does drop pretty quick when it leaves the showroom. Maybe not 50%, but it definitely isn’t linear.

Jul 11, 2014 12:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Speakerbliss wrote:
Republicans -> Welfare for corporations = Good, Welfare for poor people = Not Good.

Jul 11, 2014 12:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TheWhiteLine wrote:
“I would like to see it tied to equipment procured from domestic sources, so we don’t give tax breaks for buying Chinese machines.”

Ok, with this proviso I could get behind the idea. Not sure I go for 50%, and I sure don’t go for “permanently” – but encouraging domestic sourcing thru tax policy is long overdue.

What’s going on around here? I’ve actually been seeing real, constructive IDEAS more often. Is there actually hope yet for us?

Jul 11, 2014 12:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.