U.S. to intervene in Wisconsin, Ohio voter restriction cases

Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:51pm EDT

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (L) announces Citigroup Inc will pay $7 billion to settle a U.S. government investigation into mortgage-backed securities the bank sold in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis, during a news conference in Washington July 14, 2014 file photo.     REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (L) announces Citigroup Inc will pay $7 billion to settle a U.S. government investigation into mortgage-backed securities the bank sold in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis, during a news conference in Washington July 14, 2014 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

Related Topics

(Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Justice plans to intervene in court challenges to laws that restrict voting in Wisconsin and Ohio, Attorney General Eric Holder said in remarks released on Tuesday.

Holder told ABC news during an unaired portion of an interview last week that the Justice Department intends to file in both cases, but did not elaborate on how or when it would do so, according to a transcript of the remarks provided by the department.

Wisconsin and Ohio are among several states that have been forced to defend changes to voting protocol. Judges in recent months have overturned photo identification laws in Pennsylvania and Arkansas, and the Justice Department has intervened in similar cases challenging voting laws in Texas and North Carolina.

Republicans argue tighter rules are needed to prevent voter fraud, while Democrats say the revisions target likely Democratic voters such as minorities, the poor and college students.

Holder had already voiced his displeasure with a 2012 Wisconsin law that requires voters to have identification to cast a ballot, saying last month that it "erected significant barriers to equal access without serving any legitimate government interest."

A federal judge ruled Wisconsin's law unconstitutional in April and Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen is appealing the ruling and objected on Tuesday to federal intervention.

"At a time when an immigration crisis is rattling the nation, the Attorney General is choosing to spend taxpayer money to meddle in a state law that does nothing more than ask a voter to show a photo ID," Van Hollen said in a statement.

Ohio Republican lawmakers in February passed a law eliminating the first week of the state's five-week early voting period when people could register and vote the same day. The American Civil Liberties Union in May filed a federal lawsuit challenging its constitutionality.

(Reporting by Brendan O'Brien in Milwaukee, Kim Palmer in Cleveland; Editing by Eric Walsh)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
marinevet69 wrote:
The Federal government yet again trying to dictate how state’s govern themselves. I’m not a Libertarian or Tea Party believer,but, enough is enough. Big government has got too big and needs to be scaled back. Ohio is doing fine, thank you, we elected the government that made these laws and if we decide they are wrong we’ll elect a government to change them. Quit meddling in our affairs.

Jul 16, 2014 6:47am EDT  --  Report as abuse
4825 wrote:
Holder apparently does not want fair elections for our country. He must want us to allow non-citizens to vote. You know the Democrat motto that we have all heard of vote early and vote often. Apparently Mr. Holder agrees with this?

Jul 16, 2014 9:54am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.