U.S. judge dismisses Republican lawsuit over Obamacare subsidy for Congress

MILWAUKEE Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:45am EDT

A boy waits in line at a health insurance enrollment event in Cudahy, California March 27, 2014.  REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

A boy waits in line at a health insurance enrollment event in Cudahy, California March 27, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

Related Topics

MILWAUKEE (Reuters) - A federal judge has thrown out a U.S. Senator's legal challenge to a part of President Barack Obama's healthcare law that grants health insurance subsidies for members of Congress and their staffs.

U.S. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin had challenged the right of the federal government to continue making employer contributions to Congressional health insurance plans even when lawmakers and their staff purchase coverage through new Obamacare online exchanges.

U.S. District Judge William Griesbach, in Green Bay, dismissed the lawsuit on Monday, saying Johnson had failed to show he had been harmed by the regulation.

"There is nothing in the Constitution stipulating that all wrongs must have remedies, much less that the remedy must lie in federal court," Griesbach, who was appointed by former President George W. Bush, said in his decision.

The 2010 Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, has been the subject of years of political and legal attacks by Republicans, including unsuccessful bids to repeal it.

Monday's ruling comes less than four months before elections in which Republicans seek to expand their House majority and win control of the Senate from Obama's fellow Democrats.

After the ruling, Johnson said he still believed the Obama administration was exceeding its legal authority.

"(It) violated its own signature healthcare law by giving special treatment to members of Congress and their staffs," he said in a statement.

"I believe that this executive action by the Obama administration is unlawful and unfair, and that it is only one of many examples of this president's abuse of his constitutional duty."

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 2012 ruling, upheld the law's "individual mandate", a core provision requiring most Americans obtain health insurance by 2014 or pay a penalty.

The law also created new online marketplaces where Americans can shop for and buy insurance, with the goal of expanding coverage for uninsured and underinsured people.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Timbuk3 wrote:
“only one of many examples of this president’s abuse of his constitutional duty”

I almost hope that you will continue to sue him and lose in court, but then, you will be shirking your constitutional duty by doing so. Where do we go to sue you for failing to fulfill your duties Mr. Johnson?

Jul 22, 2014 9:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
speakfreely wrote:
I may have missed some key point. Does this mean that Congressional members and their staff who are on Obamacare are double dipping by having Congress pay 100% of the Obamacare premium PLUS getting the subsidies that pay a large part of the Obamacare premium? If so, that judge needs to rethink his decision OR the attorney arguing for the plaintiff needed to present his care more clearly.

Jul 22, 2014 12:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bdy2010 wrote:
Not surprising to see the ruling. Makes sense.

What was odd to see was a member of Congress trying NOT to take free money and waste taxpayer funds.

Jul 22, 2014 2:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.