For Californians, higher costs dampen support for clean energy

BERKELEY Calif. Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:54am EDT

Wind turbines are seen in Palm Springs, California December 20, 2013. REUTERS/Eric Thayer

Wind turbines are seen in Palm Springs, California December 20, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer

BERKELEY Calif. (Reuters) - An overwhelming majority of California residents support the state's mandate for reducing heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions, so long as they do not bear the higher costs of cleaner energy themselves, a new public opinion poll shows.

Eighty percent of adults surveyed believe climate change poses a serious threat to California's economy and lifestyle, and 68 percent back a 2006 law for lowering statewide greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

But support for specific initiatives to reach the goal appeared to wane sharply in the face of higher energy costs, the Public Policy Institute of California found in a poll released late on Wednesday.

For example, 76 percent of adults agreed with California's requirement that at least a third of all electricity it generates should come from renewable sources, such as solar and wind power, by 2020.

The same level of support was found for requiring oil refineries to produce gasoline and other fuels that yield lower carbon dioxide emissions.

But support for renewable energy quotas dropped to 46 percent when respondents were asked to factor in higher electricity rates for consumers. Likewise, approval of lower carbon fuel standards fell to 39 percent if they brought higher pump prices for motorists.

Enthusiasm for clean-energy initiatives in the face of rising consumer costs fell even further among those with lower income levels.

Fewer than a third of individuals earning less than $40,000 a year said they would favor tougher carbon fuel standards if they pushed gasoline prices higher, compared with 54 percent approval among those with annual earnings of at least $80,000.

"The belief in climate change and support for state and federal action in climate change remains very strong in California today," said Mark Baldassare, president of the Public Policy Institute. "But as discussions about cost get introduced, the group that expressed the most concern is lower-income Californians, which is where the support drops off."

The survey also found that overall approval of immediate action by the state government to curb greenhouse gases continued to climb, growing to 61 percent this year from 59 percent last year, a rise of 15 percentage points since 2012.

The poll surveyed 1,705 adult California residents by telephone from July 8 to July 15 in English and Spanish, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.

(Editing by Steve Gorman and Clarence Fernandez)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
morbas wrote:
Then why did CA choose to include sales tax when resolving CA’s budget balance?

To: Office of Senator ____________________
United States Senate Washington,
D.C. 20510
To: Office of Representative_________________________
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
We the people of this United States do proclaim this federal government ‘of, by and for the people’. That, in order to fairly distribute revenue burden, to satisfy ‘net income’ progressive taxation, to balance all governments budgets, and to not tax poverty;
The people mandate:
Income National Tax code that shall use margin graduated income tax principle: Margin $30k 0%, each dollar above this at a linear increasing rate {(Income*(Income/$800k[1])*90%[2]; 90%[2] limit} . Exemptions shall be prohibited, couples freely share income(s). The Federal Reserve shall amend the (90%[2],$800k[1]) rate point, and control currency printing mandated to maintaining currency availability and value. The Federal Reserve shall set the Margin rate value well (>2x) above highest of all State Poverty Level(s). Revenue shall be proportioned 1/3rd Federal,1/3rd State proportioned per cast ballot and 1/3rd Local proportioned per cast ballot.
This National Tax is a peoples tax, no other citizen taxation shall be permitted. Business shall not be taxed. The Federal Reserve shall control taxation. The people will by simple majority approve or reject all margin and rate changes at every Congressional House Representative election year ballot.
Tax Reduction on the many…
morbas(i)

Jul 24, 2014 9:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.