Minnesota man asked to leave Southwest flight after critical tweet

Thu Jul 24, 2014 12:04pm EDT

Related Topics

(Reuters) - A Minnesota man and his two sons were asked to leave a Southwest Airlines flight after the man sent a tweet complaining about being treated rudely by a gate agent.

Duff Watson said he was flying from Denver to Minneapolis on Sunday and tried to board in a spot for frequent flyer privileges he held and take his sons, ages 6 and 9, with him, even though they had a later spot to board the plane.

The agent told him that he would have to wit if wanted to board with his children. Watson replied that he had boarded early with them before and then sent out a tweet that read "RUDEST AGENT IN DENVER. KIMBERLY S. GATE C39. NOT HAPPY @SWA."

Watson told TV broadcaster KARE in Minneapolis on Wednesday that after he boarded, an announcement came over the plane asking his family to exit the aircraft. Once at the gate, the agent said that unless the tweet was deleted, police would be called and the family would not be allowed back onboard.

"We get bounced off the plane, and it turns into a completely different situation and escalated for reasons that are quite honestly silly," said Watson, who eventually boarded and flew back home, after agreeing to delete the tweet.

Southwest said in a statement a customer was briefly removed from the flight, and as an airline, it has no intention to stifle customer feedback on social media.

"Our decision was not based solely on a customer's tweet," it said, adding it offered the customer vouchers as a gesture of goodwill.

(Reporting by Jon Herskovitz; Editing by Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
JamVee wrote:
Sounds like utter foolishness on the part of both. The passenger didn’t like having to abide by established boarding rules (he’s a big shot), so he publishes an unwarranted insult to the whole world . . . SWA then allows their employees (including the gate attendant) to violate the US constitution, to assuage his or her bruised (and overly sensitive) ego. Utter foolishness, all around!!

Jul 24, 2014 12:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.