Pennsylvania parents locked son in car trunk to cure fear of dark

PITTSBURGH Pa. Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:51pm EDT

Related Topics

PITTSBURGH Pa. (Reuters) - A western Pennsylvania couple, accused of luring their five-year-old son into the trunk of their car with candy to resolve his fear of the dark, was granted probation this week, according to court officials on Friday.

Jeffrey and Danielle Lenhart were charged with felony child endangerment and reckless endangerment for locking their son in the car during three trips to the Idlewild amusement park in Lingonier, Pennsylvania, in July 2013, court records showed.

They gave him a flashlight and told him to look for sweets before locking the trunk at the park, about 9.5-miles (15 km) from their home in Latrobe, court officials said.

They were accepted into the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program on Thursday in a deal approved by Westmoreland County Judge Richard McCormick Jr., according to Danielle Lenhart's lawyer, Deborah Jackson.

"She recognizes the serious nature of what has happened and I don't think we will see her in court again," Jackson said of her client. 

The incidents came to light when one of the couple's children was interviewed by child welfare officials for undisclosed reasons, according to the Pittsburgh Tribune Review.

The boy and another sibling, who is 4, have been staying with relatives following the charges, but will be returned to the home, court officials said. A younger sibling, 1, has already been reunited with the parents.

Upon completion of two years probation, charges against the Lenharts will be dismissed and records expunged, Jackson said.

A previous judge in the case did not want to allow the Lenharts to enter the rehabilitative program, but Jackson said she was pleased with McCormick's decision.

(Editing by Barbara Goldberg and Bernadette Baum)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Shoes58 wrote:
Just another example of why we need to have IQ tests before allowing idiots like this to reproduce. No pass, no child. Perhaps this country wouldn’t be in the crapper with a law like this.

Jul 26, 2014 1:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
There should be some sort of competency testing for parenthood.

Just the thought of these people being in charge of vulnerable children is terrifying to me. Their lack of the capability to exercise sound judgement could cost these children their lives.

Jul 27, 2014 12:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Shuny wrote:
What kind of crazy judge would think these parents could ever be rehabilitated? It’s hard to believe but they are dumber than Honey Booboo’s family.

Jul 28, 2014 11:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.