Obama rails against corporate maneuver to evade U.S. taxes

LOS ANGELES Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:03am EDT

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks before signing the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act at the White House in Washington July 22, 2014. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks before signing the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act at the White House in Washington July 22, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama on Thursday hammered U.S. companies that avoid federal taxes by shifting their tax domiciles overseas in deals known as "inversions" and called on Congress to pass a bill to curb the practice.

During remarks to a rowdy crowd at the Los Angeles Technical College, Obama promoted what he called "economic patriotism" and made clear he believed the companies that were engaging in such practices were not being patriotic. The president was in California on a three-day fund-raising swing for Democrats.

So-called inversion deals occur when a U.S. company acquires or sets up a foreign company, then moves its U.S. tax domicile to the foreign company and its lower-tax home country.

Nine inversion deals have been reached this year by companies ranging from banana distributor Chiquita Brands International Inc to drugmaker AbbVie Inc, and more are under consideration.

The transactions are setting a record pace since the first inversion was carried out 32 years ago.

"Even as corporate profits are higher than ever, there’s a small but growing group of big corporations that are fleeing the country to get out of paying taxes,” Obama said.

"They’re technically renouncing their U.S. citizenship, they’re declaring their base someplace else even though most of their operations are here. You know some people are calling these companies 'corporate deserters.'”

Obama said he did not begrudge companies making profits but said corporate tax evasion practices made it harder for the middle class - his target political constituency - to succeed.

Several Democrats have offered bills to curb inversions, which let companies cut their taxes primarily by putting foreign earnings out of the reach of the Internal Revenue Service.

Obama threw his weight behind the Democratic bills, calling for a rule change that would deem any company with half of its business in the United States to be U.S.-domiciled.

The proposed changes, already put forward in the president's annual budget, would be retroactive to May 2014 and implemented independently of moves to achieve broader tax reform.

Republicans prefer a change to inversions to be part of an effort to reform the U.S. tax code.

“Under President Obama, the United States has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. It doesn’t have to be that way: Comprehensive tax reform would reduce deductions and lower tax rates for everyone," said Michael Steel, spokesman for the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives, John Boehner.

The White House supports broad tax reform but argues that action on inversions should not wait.

"We need to stop companies from renouncing their citizenship just to get out of paying their fair share of taxes," Obama said. "We can’t wait for that. You shouldn’t get to call yourself an American company only when you want a handout from American taxpayers."

The issue is a prominent one in Obama's home state of Illinois. Walgreen Co, the largest U.S. drugstore chain, is considering moving its tax home base abroad with such a deal. Protesters in Chicago went to the company's flagship store on Thursday to rally against its plans.

(Additional reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh in Washington and Fiona Ortiz in Chicago; Editing by Jonathan Oatis and Michael Perry)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (42)
ThoseWhoServe wrote:
The Supreme Court has told us that corporations are people. What they didn’t tell us was that while they believe they are people; they don’t believe in paying taxes, serving in the Armed Forces, or assuming any responsibility to make the U.S. a better place for its’ people.

Jul 25, 2014 1:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
tkboxer wrote:
When the government imposes the highest corporate tax rate in the world, is 17 trillion dollars in debt and waste money everywhere what else would you expect from U.S. global corporations? They have to make a profit for their workers and shareholders. Maybe government should get a grip.

Jul 25, 2014 1:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Until the election is over, nothing will happen. Even then, campaign donations will probably make sure that the current law remains as-is. Two laws would fix this problem permanently:

1. If you sell products in America, you must make those products in only the 50 states of America and the District of Columbia.

2. If you build products in America, you must hire verified American citizens as 90% or more of your workforce.

Failure to abide by either of these laws results in a 200 – 500% tariff on all goods and services sold by the offending supposedly-American company. After all, if 90% of your workforce is in another country, doesn’t that mean the company is only 10% American? Aren’t you being anti-American at that point?

Jul 25, 2014 3:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.