Renting drives U.S. homeownership to 19-year low

WASHINGTON Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:53pm EDT

A vacant home is shown in North Las Vegas, Nevada April 2, 2013.       REUTER/Steve Marcus

A vacant home is shown in North Las Vegas, Nevada April 2, 2013. REUTER/Steve Marcus

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Homeownership in the United States hit a 19-year low in the second quarter as tight finances continued to drive Americans toward renting, one of the lasting legacies of the recession.

The seasonally adjusted homeownership rate fell to 64.8 percent, the lowest level since the second quarter of 1995, the Commerce Department said on Tuesday.

That compared to 65.0 percent in the first three months of 2014 and 65.1 percent a year ago.

Economists said homeownership, which peaked at 69.4 percent in 2004, could fall even further as banks maintain stringent lending practices and wage growth remains tepid, despite an acceleration in job creation.

"We are becoming more of a rental society. It's becoming harder to own a home," said Patrick Newport, an economist at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts. "People who lost their homes to foreclosure are now renting and credit standards have tightened significantly."

The 2007-2009 recession, sparked by the collapse of the U.S. housing market, has left the economy with deep scars that will take long to heal. Wage growth remains lackluster, even though the unemployment rate is at six-year lows and the economy has recouped all the jobs lost during the downturn.

Weak wage gains have combined with higher mortgage rates and home prices to force many to give up on the American dream of home ownership, leading to a tightening of the rental market.

In the second quarter, the residential rental vacancy rate dropped to 7.5 percent, the lowest level in more than 19 years.

"That is not surprising, young adults are choosing to rent," said Yelena Shulyatyeva, an economist at BNP Paribas in New York. "The shock from the financial crisis is still here."

The shift toward renting could further boost the construction of multi-family units and undermine the single-family segment, the biggest sector of the housing market.

Multi-family starts have seen double digit growth over the last few years as developers scrambled to meet demand for rental units, while groundbreaking for single-family homes generally has been weak. This trend suggests the housing market recovery will remain sluggish for a while.

In the second quarter, the number of occupied housing units - a gauge of household formation - increased 458,000 from a year ago. Economists said the increase was far below what would be needed to signal a strong housing recovery.

"Historically that number has been over a million, it has to be over a million in order for the housing market to start growing significantly," said IHS Global Insight's Newport.

"We are not seeing much growth in household formation, which means that young people graduating from college are moving in with their parents. That trend has not changed much and is the key reason why the housing recovery has been so weak."

(Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Tom Brown)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (5)
BeRealistic wrote:
Wait, as late as yesterday there was a report here about the recovering housing market. We are provided propaganda stating how great the economy and employment pictures are. Is this a sign of an awakening media to report the real picture and state of the nation? One can hope.

Jul 29, 2014 10:55am EDT  --  Report as abuse
4825 wrote:
Wow, that Obama guy is really doing such a great job for the country. US home ownership falls to a level not seen since the last democrat (Clinton) was in office 20 years ago.

Jul 29, 2014 11:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
chuck2 wrote:
Gee less home sales when worker raised have raised to what? Seems WS records are not related to commoners records as middle/lower real wealth, real ages going down, and yet prices remain same or go up, wonder who is getting the extra money, dare we ask?

Jul 29, 2014 11:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.