FEATURE-Synthetics pose a conundrum for world diamond industry

Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:52am EDT

Related Topics

* Industry worried about mixing synthetic with natural diamonds

* Israel Diamond Exchange has banned synthetics

* Production of synthetics still small but growing

* Tiffany's invests heavily in protecting its products

By Ari Rabinovitch

TEL AVIV, July 31 (Reuters) - Diamonds are a girl's best friend - but only if they are natural.

That is the message mining companies and luxury jewellers are keen to instill in consumers as the diamond trade faces a growing challenge from the production of synthetic diamonds.

Global diamond jewellery sales are worth more than $72 billion a year, according to the World Diamond Council, and jewellers like Tiffany and diamond miners led by De Beers stress that a jewel mined at great expense, and often with great risk, is infinitely more valuable than one made by man.

But it can be hard to tell the difference.

Synthetic diamonds can be manufactured in a laboratory to the extent that they have the same properties as natural ones, raising the risk that a synthetic product could one day inadvertently end up in a luxury jeweller's showroom.

"God help the major diamond jeweller, be it Cartier, Tiffany, Van Cleef, anybody, who puts a piece of jewellery out there and it's later found to be having synthetic diamonds in it without disclosure. That fear is what's driving the industry," said Martin Rapaport, chairman of the Rapaport Group, which is the primary source of diamond price information around the world.

Synthetic diamond production is still small: annual output of gem-quality rough synthetic diamonds is less than 350,000 carats, a fraction of the 125 million carats of natural gem-quality rough, according to India's Natural Diamond Monitoring Committee.

Synthetic diamonds are legitimate and are increasingly used for industrial purposes, and higher quality lab-produced diamonds are used in jewellery. What worries the industry is their use in natural diamond jewellery without disclosure.

Tiffany says it is confident it is not at risk of inadvertently selling synthetic diamonds.

"We do not and will not sell non-mined diamonds. Tiffany's insistence on only the highest standards produces diamonds that are of the utmost beauty," the company told Reuters in a statement.

But the diamond industry is stepping up action and technology to ward against the mixing of synthetics and natural diamonds in the market.

In a corner of the trading floor on the Israel Diamond Exchange, one of the world's largest diamond markets, in Ramat Gan near Tel Aviv, a worker operates a new machine developed by the Gemological Institute of America (GIA), offering to test any diamond if a buyer is unsure of its origin.

"We have to be very cautious. Very, very cautious, and check. Not go according to our expertise only. We have to use this machinery," said Shmuel Schnitzer, president of the exchange.

The exchange has banned synthetics from its trading floor since last year and adopted the slogan "Natural is Real" for its advertising and marketing.

If someone is caught peddling undeclared synthetics?

"He's finished. Because the main thing here at our business is trust," said Schnitzer.

De Beers, owned by Anglo American and the world's largest supplier of rough diamonds by value, has just developed an Automated Melee Screening instrument that can test large parcels of small diamonds at a rate of 360 stones per hour.

"I think we put a good number of measures in place. We've been developing a lot of technology in order to assist the marketplace in identifying synthetics," said Paul Rowley, executive vice president in charge of sales at De Beers.

Depending on who you ask, synthetic diamonds trade at a 20 to 50 percent discount to the natural stones.

While they are unlikely to ever fetch the same price as natural diamonds, synthetics are here to stay, said diamond consultant Edahn Golan.

"Their introduction into the market in a major way is inevitable. Right now it's a trickle," Golan said.

In the past two years reports have popped up of undisclosed mixing, breeding a level of mistrust within the diamond supply chain.

Chemically, physically and optically the two kinds of diamonds are the same, said Tom Moses, chief laboratory and research officer at the GIA, which grades and evaluates diamonds.

The only thing differentiating them is how they are formed - one underground over a couple billion years, the other in a lab over two to three days.

The GIA has discovered undeclared lab-grown diamonds, Moses said, but "fortunately, it's a very small number of instances".

Rapaport, however, cites a case in China when someone obtained an authentic GIA grading report of an existing diamond and created a synthetic diamond to match it exactly.

ULTIMATE GIFT

The industry has experience of having to protect the market. Conflict diamonds, or "blood diamonds", whereby production in countries such as Angola or Sierra Leone among others has been used to fund violent conflict or involves human rights abuses, have been a particular problem.

International pressure on governments and the diamond industry to take action to eliminate conflict diamonds from international trade has had some success although the problem has not been wiped out entirely. Tackling the undisclosed mixing of synthetic diamonds may be an even bigger challenge because the product is so sophisticated.

"How can you trust your supplier? What is your supply chain like? The issue isn't just if the diamonds are involved in human rights abuses anymore," Rapaport said. "This whole idea of trust within the industry, this is now being raised to a much higher level than it ever was before."

One case that caused a stir was in 2012 when the lab of the International Gemological Institute - a certifier of diamonds like the GIA - in Antwerp uncovered in a parcel of about 1,000 small diamonds believed to be natural, that more than 600 were man-made.

And they were not "ordinary" synthetics, but included "impurities, which were apparently intentionally introduced in the synthetic production process not to make the stone more beautiful but solely to make the stone look more natural," the institute said.

Lisa Bissell, chief executive at New York-based Pure Grown Diamonds, a leading distributor of lab-produced diamonds for jewellery, said the synthetic diamond sector is still in its infancy. Her company recently changed its name from Gemesis to highlight that its stones were synthetic not natural.

"Differentiation or disclosure is the base of the diamond industry, of which we all are equal participants," she said.

Part of the appeal of lab-produced diamonds, she said, is that consumers can be sure they are buying diamonds that are "sustainable, certified, and conflict-free".

Traders of natural diamonds say sentiment will always set their product apart.

"We are very much of the opinion that there is a huge difference between the two. Very much from an emotional value perspective," said De Beers' Rowley.

The industry's response to cases of nondisclosure has been "robust", bringing them quickly into the limelight, he said.

De Beers itself is involved in synthetic diamond production, strictly for industrial use. It owns Element Six, which makes synthetics for uses such as synthetic diamond sensors in radiation therapy and synthetic diamond cutters for oil and gas drilling, saying the stone's exceptional hardness compared with other materials and its high resistance to thermal shock, among other properties, make it an ideal industrial material.

Tiffany says it invests heavily to ensure there is no confusion about the purity of its diamonds.

"We do not have any evidence that non-mined diamonds are affecting our sales in any way," the company told Reuters in a statement. "We have always led the industry by grading our own diamonds and have invested in our sourcing, our supply chain and technology to ensure that the diamonds sold in Tiffany's jewelry meet our strict standards."

But within the diamond industry risks associated with rising production of synthetic products are being felt.

"Of course they (diamond exchanges, producers and distributors) are threatened and they should be threatened," said Rapaport. "If we want to maintain the idea that the diamond is the ultimate gift ... then the diamond industry has to do something about that." (Editing by Susan Fenton)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.