India, U.S. stress strategic ties but tensions remain

NEW DELHI Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:21pm EDT

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry addresses the media as India's External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj (R) looks on during their joint news conference New Delhi July 31, 2014.  REUTERS/Adnan Abidi

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry addresses the media as India's External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj (R) looks on during their joint news conference New Delhi July 31, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Adnan Abidi

Related Topics

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The United States and India stressed their desire to boost business and defense ties on Thursday, but trade and spying rows were a reminder of the obstacles to President Barack Obama's vision of a "defining" partnership.

After a day of meetings in New Delhi seen as a preparation for a September visit to Washington by new Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the Indian leader's election had created a "singular opportunity."

"The moment has never been more ripe to deliver on the incredible possibilities in the relationship between our two nations," he told a news conference after the annual Strategic Dialogue meeting between the two countries.

"The United States and India can and should be indispensable partners in the 21st century," he said.

His Indian counterpart, Sushma Swaraj, said the two countries were at "an important turning point" and said they shared "converging long-term strategic interests."

She told the news conference that India was keen to see greater U.S. business participation in its economy and expanded defense cooperation.

Kerry said delivering on the potential was key and much needed to be done to deliver concrete progress by Modi's visit.

He stressed the need to break down barriers to trade, subsidies and protectionism, which U.S. firms have long cited as obstacles in India.

He hailed Modi's commitment to economic reform, but added: "We are waiting to see — the proof is always in the pudding."

The comments show lingering frustrations in a relationship that, while it has come a long way since the suspicions of the Cold War, has yet to live up to Obama's 2010 rhetorical billing as "one of the defining partnerships of the 21st century."

TRADE, SPYING ROWS

The talks in Delhi were overshadowed by a dispute over India's opposition to a world trade pact and a new expression of Indian irritation over U.S. surveillance activity.

Kerry urged India to reconsider its threat to veto the landmark pact agreed last year in Bali, which aims to speed trade by standardizing customs rules and slashing red tape.

New Delhi has insisted it must see more progress on a parallel pact giving it more freedom to subsidize and stockpile food grains than is allowed by World Trade Organization rules.

For its part, India on Thursday, raised the issue of U.S. surveillance activities, with Sushma saying such acts were "unacceptable" and had caused resentment in her country.

According to a document leaked by former U.S. security contractor Edward Snowden and published by the Washington Post earlier this year, Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party was among a handful of political organizations a U.S. court allowed the U.S. National Security Agency to spy on.

Kerry said it was not U.S. practice to comment on intelligence matters but added: "We fully respect and understand the feelings expressed by the minister."

The Obama administration sees India as a key strategic counter-balance in Asia to an increasingly assertive China and has been seeking to revive ties since Modi's election in May.

The relationship took a dive last year after an Indian diplomat was arrested in New York on charges of mistreating her domestic help, an episode that provoked outrage in New Delhi.

Modi himself was banned from visiting the United States after Hindu mobs killed more than 1,000 people, most of them Muslims, in 2002 while he was chief minister of his home state of Gujarat.

Kerry said the visa ban was from another time.

“It wasn’t me,” he said in an interview with India's NDTV network. "Different government, this is a different government.”

Kerry said Modi would be welcomed in Washington "no questions whatsoever."

"We want a new relationship. We want to see things move in a very positive way," he said.

(Reporting by David Brunnstrom, Sanjeev Miglani and Rajesh Kumar Singh; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
Mott wrote:
“.. barriers to trade, subsidies and protectionism, which U.S. firms have long cited as obstacles in India ..”

It’s hard to make a case against food subsidies considering these developing nation’s central need to support their poor-at-large communities.

After-all, we allocate over a $100B farm subsidies from US tax payer dollars.

How then, can we turn around and preach the world-communities not to do so?

Jul 31, 2014 3:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
sensi wrote:
“The Obama administration sees India as a key strategic counter-balance in Asia to an increasingly assertive China and has been seeking to revive ties since Modi’s election in May.”

I am sure that Asia can’t wait for the USA’s “pivot to asia”, must be the last part of the world not enduring yet the US engineered tensions, nauseous alliance with bullies, mayhem and destruction…

Jul 31, 2014 4:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Reality2Day wrote:
By expanding economic ties with India and other SE Asian nations the US can move jobs from China and weaken its’ economy, thus weakening its’ ability to increase its’ military. Increasing defense and a possible alliance adds 1.25 billion Indians vs. the 1.36 billion Chinese, could be a wise move.

Jul 31, 2014 10:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus