UPDATE 5-Argentina debt talks must continue after default: U.S. Judge

Fri Aug 1, 2014 7:39pm EDT

(Updates with Argentina seeking domestic probe into litigation, court order on Euroclear and Clearstream)

By Joseph Ax, Nicholas Brown and Sarah Marsh

NEW YORK/BUENOS AIRES Aug 1 (Reuters) - Argentina cannot turn its back on negotiations with holdout creditors after defaulting on its sovereign debt, a U.S. judge instructed on Friday, just as the country's failure to service a June interest payment was declared a "credit event."

In a stern tone, U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa in New York slammed the decision by Latin America's third-biggest economy to defy his order to pay holdout investors in full and instead default on $29 billion in debt.

As Griesa was speaking, a 15-member committee facilitated by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) voted unanimously to call the missed coupon payment a "credit event." The move triggers a payout process for holders of insurance on Argentine debt, which analysts estimate could amount to roughly $1 billion.

Argentina's economy ministry said later in a combative statement that Griesa's attitude sought to favor "vulture funds". It has asked Argentina's securities watchdog to investigate whether the litigation against the nation by holdouts was merely the "facade of speculative manoeuvre".

Griesa said: "Nothing that has happened this week has removed the necessity of working out a settlement." He chided Argentina for making public statements he characterized as misleading.

"The debts weren't extinguished. There's no bankruptcy, no insolvency proceedings," Griesa said. "The debts are still there."

The veteran judge has been at the centre of Argentina's drawn-out fight against the New York hedge funds suing it for full payment on bonds they bought on the cheap following the country's record 2002 default on $100 billion in debt.

The lead holdout investors are NML Capital Ltd, an affiliate of Elliott Management Corp and Aurelius Capital Management.

Argentine bond prices slightly extended earlier losses after Griesa's comments.

In other markets, the blue-chip Merval stock index pared earlier losses to trade down just 0.6 percent from Thursday's close at 8,150.91. The peso currency traded fractionally weaker on the black market at 12.700 per U.S. dollar.

Griesa told both sides to continue working with mediator Daniel Pollack, a lawyer one senior Argentine government minister had dubbed "incompetent" a day earlier.

Argentina's lead lawyer told the judge the Buenos Aires government had no confidence in Pollack after he released a statement after negotiations broke down, saying the case had become "highly politicized."

"The Republic of Argentina believes ... it was harmful and prejudiced to the republic and the impact on the market," lawyer Jonathan Blackman said in an exchange that prompted Griesa to tell the hearing that everyone should "cool down" about ideas of mistrust.

In a separate procedural action, Griesa signed an order allowing Euroclear and Clearstream, like Citibank, to make a one-time payment with respect to certain U.S. dollar-denominated bonds that were issued under Argentine law in the 2005 and 2010 debt restructurings.

RISK OF ACCELERATION

The Argentine government maintains it has not defaulted because it had made a required interest payment to a bank intermediary on one of its bonds. But Griesa blocked that deposit in June, saying it violated his ruling that Argentina settle its dispute with holdout investors first.

As a result, holders of exchanged Argentine bonds did not receive the interest coupon payment by a July 30 deadline.

On Friday, the ISDA-facilitated Determinations Committee declared that a "failure to pay" event had happened. It will now hold an auction to settle outstanding credit default swap (CDS) transactions.

CDS reaction was muted as market participants waited for ISDA's auction process to start and investment accounts remained hesitant to take positions.

"The amounts are not very large. We estimate the amount of CDS outstanding for Argentina at about $1 billion; it's not something that's going to systemically affect financial markets," said Jorge Mariscal, emerging markets chief investment officer at UBS Wealth Management.

One of the lead holdouts, NML, has in the past denied Argentine accusations that it wants to trigger a default to get a windfall on its holdings of CDS.

Before Friday's hearing, Argentina's government had said it expected nothing favourable to come from Griesa. It has previously called the federal judge an "agent" of the New York hedge funds.

Argentina had argued it needed to await the Dec. 31 expiration of a legal clause barring it from paying better terms to the holdouts than those accepted by restructured debt holders before changing its negotiating terms, said Ander Faergemann, senior emerging debt fund manager at PineBridge Investments in London.

Argentina's latest debt crisis is in sharp contrast to the mayhem that surrounded its default in 2002, when the economy collapsed around a broke government and millions of Argentines lost their jobs. This time the government is solvent.

Asked how painful the default would be to the shrinking economy, Rune Hejrskov at Jyske Invest said: "It really depends if it's a 'default lite' (quick settlement) or a hard default. Either way, there will be a toll on the macro backdrop."

Fund managers have generally said the market so far has priced in an agreement within the next six months.

However, some have said the risk that bondholders would accelerate their demands on the principal value and accrued interest would grow if expectations of a deal waned.

"I would not be surprised if this drags on longer, which would complicate the picture," UBS's Mariscal said when asked if there would be an acceleration. (Additional reporting by Richard Lough, Eliana Raszewski and Walter Bianchi in Buenos Aires and Carolyn Cohn, Andrew Winterbottom and Davide Scigliuzzo in London and Daniel Bases in New York; Writing by Richard Lough; Editing by W Simon, Jonathan Oatis, Simon Gardner and Ken Wills)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
GermanHoldout wrote:
ARGENTINA SHOULD HAVE ONLY GIVEN A SIGN, A PROMISE TO JUDGE GRIESA / MEDIATOR POLLACK AND THE HOLDOUTS, THAT IT WOULD NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH AND IT WILL FULFILL THE COURT ORDER (EXTENDED TO ALL HOLDOUTS) AND REPAY THE DEBT TO THE HOLDOUTS, AFTER THE RUFO CLAUSE EXPIRES IN DECEMBER 2014.

THEN THE HOLDOUTS WOULD HAVE SURELY ASKED JUDGE GRIESA TO REINSTALL THE “STAY” UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2015.

IT WOULD BE SURELY ADVISABLE FOR ARGENTINA AND THE HOLDOUTS TO CONTINUE WITH NEGOTIATIONS.

Aug 03, 2014 10:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.