Google, Facebook pay for shuttles to use San Francisco bus stops

SAN FRANCISCO Fri Aug 1, 2014 5:34pm EDT

A San Francisco police officer stands in front of a Google commuter bus after clearing demonstrators blocking its path in the Mission District in San Francisco, California August 1, 2014. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

A San Francisco police officer stands in front of a Google commuter bus after clearing demonstrators blocking its path in the Mission District in San Francisco, California August 1, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Commuter shuttles run by Google Inc, Facebook Inc and other Silicon Valley companies began paying on Friday to make stops at San Francisco bus stations after protests blamed them for gentrification.

The private buses, which for years have taken tech workers from San Francisco to their offices in Silicon Valley, have in recent months drawn criticism from groups who say that by catering to well-paid professionals, the buses lead to higher rents in diverse, low-income neighborhoods.

Protesters also have said the vehicles get in the way of municipal buses.

Under an 18-month pilot program that launched on Friday, the shuttle services will be allowed to use bus stops at over 100 locations throughout the city and in exchange they will pay at least $3.55 each time they pick up or drop off passengers, officials said.

The program has not completely quieted protests. A group of about two dozen demonstrators gathered in the Mission District on Friday to express continuing anger at the buses, which glided by them with their new, bright green permit placards.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) estimates there are 35,000 daily trips made on the shuttles, and that through this program it will raise $3.7 million to cover costs for making sure they run smoothly.

“We're grateful to the SFMTA for taking the lead on the pilot and look forward to working with the city and participating shuttle operators to refine the program,” a Google spokesman said in a statement.

Richard Drury, lead attorney in a lawsuit filed in May against the city and a number of companies involved in the shuttle bus program, said exhaust fumes from the buses are a concern in neighborhoods where they operate.

“The Mission District, a historically Latino area, is ground zero for this program,” Drury said. “One of the main impacts of the program is that it allows high-income people to displace low-income residents in the Mission.”

His group is calling for the city to put more effort into studying effects of the shuttle buses.

SFMTA declined to comment on the lawsuit.

“For many years now we’ve had commuter shuttles operating within the city,” said SFMTA spokeswoman Kristen Holland. “They are large charter buses that are regulated as vehicles themselves, outside of our purview. We’re just regulating where they stop.”

(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis, Bernard Orr)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
nowayhose wrote:
A case of “Let me through, I work for Google?”

Aug 01, 2014 5:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
revamadison wrote:
How stupid is this? Don’t these folks know that the company employees taking these buses, also take hundreds of other vehicles off the road, so that there is less road use? These are also passengers that do not require spacing on public buses, thus freeing them up for poorer or just plain, other, passengers. You can bet that if their own companies provided free transportation, they wouldn’t turn it down. Some people just cant stand for others to take advantage of having a good education, and getting a good job.

Aug 01, 2014 6:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.