Mississippi Tea Party candidate challenges Cochran's primary win

JACKSON Miss. Mon Aug 4, 2014 9:37pm EDT

1 of 2. A combination photo shows Republican U.S. Senator Thad Cochran (L) in Pass Christian, Mississippi in this June 19, 2014 file photo and Tea Party candidate Chris McDaniel (R) in Hattiesburg, Mississippi in this June 24, 2014 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Lee Celano (L) REUTERS/Jonathan Bachman (R)

Related Topics

JACKSON Miss. (Reuters) - Chris McDaniel, the Tea Party-backed U.S. Senate candidate who lost the Mississippi Republican primary runoff, filed a legal challenge to the result on Monday, alleging that he fell short in the June 24 vote because of election fraud.

McDaniel submitted a 28-page legal challenge and supporting documentation with the state's Republican Party, outlining what he claims are thousands of instances of voter fraud. The party's executive committee has 10 days to decide whether to hear the case.

Joe Nosef, the state Republican Party chairman, said shortly after the filing that he had not yet reviewed the challenge and could not comment on what the committee intends to do. 

If the committee fails to act, McDaniel would seek a judicial review in one of the state’s chancery courts, said his attorney, Mitch Tyner.

McDaniel lost the runoff to incumbent U.S. Senator Thad Cochran by more than 7,667 votes. Cochran faces a Democratic opponent in the November general election.

According to the challenge, some 15,000 votes were fraudulently or inaccurately cast. The most egregious violations came from Hinds County, home of the state capitol, Jackson. The challenge requests results from Hinds County be omitted entirely. 

“We anticipate that after they review the challenge that they’ll see that Chris McDaniel clearly, clearly won the Republican vote,” Tyner said at a news conference held outside his Jackson office. “I say that very assuredly because that’s what the mathematics show.”

Earlier, McDaniel's campaign said it had found thousands of cases of voters casting ballots in the Democratic primary and then in the Republican runoff, which is against election rules.

It also highlighted unsubstantiated allegations that some Democrats were paid to vote for Cochran.

The primary runoff, pitting the Republican establishment against the insurgent Tea Party movement, had become a multimillion-dollar referendum on the direction of the GOP as it tries to win control of the U.S. Senate in the November congressional elections.

Cochran will fight the challenge, said his campaign attorney, Mark Garriga. Citizens for Cochran retained the Jackson-based law firm of Butler Snow to defend the candidate’s primary win.

“The filing of this challenge marks the point where this matter moves from an arena of press conferences and rhetoric into a setting where nothing matters but admissible evidence and the rule of law,” Garriga said in a press release.

(Reporting by Frank McGurty; Editing by Jim Loney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
9825 wrote:
Bet Chris McDaniel has proof if he is challenging the results. For some reason it does not surprise me that Democrats voted in both primaries to try to sway the election results. We all know the Democrat motto is vote early and vote often. Can they not win anything without cheating?

Aug 04, 2014 9:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
carnivalchaos wrote:
“The challenge requests results from Hinds County be omitted entirely.” LOL…right, just cancel the votes of anyone who didn’t vote for your guy. Cancel the votes of blacks. Republicans love to disenfranchise American voters. They think it’s no big deal just to discard votes and election results when the results aren’t what they want. They get more comfortable doing this with each election cycle. Republicans just don’t like democracy. They want a form of rightwing authoritarian rule.

Aug 04, 2014 11:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
carnivalchaos wrote:
“The challenge requests results from Hinds County be omitted entirely.” This is fair. Cancelling the votes of blacks is reasonable. Republicans oppose disenfranchising American voters. They wouldn’t discard votes if there wasn’t good reason. But with each election cycle it’s becoming an important step to consider. Republicans are strong supporters of democracy. They wouldn’t want a form of rightwing authoritarian rule.

Aug 04, 2014 12:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.