Australian billionaire politician apologizes for TV tirade over China

SYDNEY Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:08pm EDT

Australian billionaire Clive Palmer speaks at a news conference to announce his plan to build Titanic II, a modern replica of the doomed ocean liner, at the Ritz in central London in this March 2, 2013 file photo. REUTERS/Olivia Harris/Files

Australian billionaire Clive Palmer speaks at a news conference to announce his plan to build Titanic II, a modern replica of the doomed ocean liner, at the Ritz in central London in this March 2, 2013 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Olivia Harris/Files

SYDNEY (Reuters) - Australian mining magnate and politician Clive Palmer has apologized to China's ambassador to Australia for a tirade in which he referred to the Chinese government as "bastards", setting off a firestorm in Canberra and Beijing.

The apology, in the form of a letter to Ambassador MA Zhaoxu, came after Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott and China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned his remarks aired on television on Aug 18.

"I regret any hurt or anguish such comments may have caused any party and I look forward to greater understanding for peace and cooperation in the future," Palmer, whose Palmer United Party holds the balance of power in parliament's upper house, wrote in a letter addressed to the ambassador.

Palmer released the letter dated Aug. 25 to the public on Tuesday. The Chinese embassy could not be reached for comment.

China is Australia's biggest trade partner with two-way trade approaching $150 billion, representing more than 20 percent of Australia's total trade.

Palmer later insisted the live-to-air comments were directed at a Chinese company he's battling in court, not the Chinese government or people.

The billionaire tycoon is locked in a legal fight with Chinese firm CITIC Pacific Ltd over cost overruns and royalty payments involving the Sino Iron project in Western Australia, China's biggest foreign mining investment.

"In keeping an open mind, I now come to the realization that what I said ... was an insult to Chinese people everywhere and I wish to assure them they have my most genuine and sincere apology," he wrote. "I am sorry that I said the things I said on the program."

Palmer has been a thorn in the side of Abbott's government since his Palmer United Party won three seats in Australia's senate at last September’s elections.

After holding the new senate hostage over the repeal of Australia's controversial carbon tax for weeks as he haggled for concessions, he has now vowed to block the budget in its current form.

(Reporting by James Regan; Editing by Jeremy Laurence)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
CountryPride wrote:
Another spineless moron who has kowtowed to the PC police. He supposedly gets cheated out of 200 million dollars by the Chinese and uses some insults against them and then apologizes for the insults? Let’s not use common sense and all denounce the criminals who have defrauded him of millions of dollars, let’s follow the PC police and demand an apology for him insulting thieves. What nonsense, he deserves to be cheated of even more money for apologizing to those who have robbed him.

Aug 25, 2014 12:07am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Kailim wrote:
CountryPride,

You should find out what has actually happened between Clive Palmer and CITIC prior to making your unreasonable and irrational comment.

For a more objective view and some facts, you may read Howard Winn’s article of August-23 titled ‘Sino Iron fiasco has Clive Palmer changing his attitude to China’ at scmp.com.

Aug 26, 2014 9:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus