By Jane Baird
LONDON (Reuters) - A senior UK financial watchdog defended the credit rating agencies on Wednesday but also supported current regulatory reviews of their objectivity and performance in the wake of the credit crisis.
"Credit rating agencies have been subject to much criticism," said Thomas Huertas, acting managing director of wholesale and institutional markets at the Financial Services Authority, at the Reuters Finance Summit.
"But for things that have been rated triple-A, even in the subprime mortgage space, there has been no significant default as yet to my knowledge," he said. "There is a possibility they could get rated from triple-A to double-A, but that is what ratings have always done."
The criticism has arisen as the agencies have announced hundreds of ratings downgrades of credit securities backed by U.S. subprime mortgages as defaults have risen.
Brian McManus, managing director of Wachovia Securities, had told other investors at the Opal European CDO Summit last month, "The problem is how the rating agencies compete, which tends to favor lower credit standards, high ratings and stable ratings."
The agencies are paid by sellers of securities to provide ratings, not by investors in those securities.
"I'm an advocate of the free market but if you are a criminal, you can't pick your police force," McManus said.
Even so, he did not advocate greater regulatory interference, which he said "would just make things worse". Continued...
© Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights reserved.
| Paper | Aug 20 - 21, 2008 | Manufacturing |
| Japan Investment | Jul 01 - 2, 2008 | Country Summits |
| Global Real Estate | Jun 23 - 25, 2008 | Real Estate |
| Consumer and Retail | Jun 16 - 18, 2008 | Consumer Retail |
| Investment Outlook | Jun 09 - 12, 2008 | Financial Services / Exchanges |
