* Major broadcasters lose bid for preliminary injunction
* Judge said ruling for broadcasters could shut Aereo down
* Some broadcasters, including Fox, plan appeal
* Online venture launched in NYC area in March
By Jonathan Stempel and Yinka Adegoke
July 11 A federal judge has rejected a bid by
major U.S. broadcasters to stop Aereo Inc, an online television
venture backed by billionaire Barry Diller, to stop
rebroadcasting some of its programming over the Internet.
U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan said on Wednesday that
while the broadcasters demonstrated they faced irreparable
financial damage if were the venture were allowed to continue,
Aereo also showed it would face severe harm if the requested
preliminary injunction were granted.
"First and foremost, the evidence establishes that an
injunction may quickly mean the end of Aereo as a business," the
Manhattan judge wrote in a 52-page opinion.
Walt Disney Co's ABC, CBS Corp, Comcast
Corp's NBCUniversal and Telemundo, News Corp's
Fox, Univision Communications Inc and the
Public Broadcasting Service had filed lawsuits accusing Aereo of
copyright violations, even before the service was launched in
the New York City area in March for $12 per month.
The broadcasters sought to stop Aereo from streaming
programs to phones, tablet computers and other devices, saying
they would lose their right to retransmission fees from cable
and other companies that rebroadcast their programming, and also
lose critical advertising revenue.
In a joint statement, Fox, PBS, Univision and the New
York-area stations WNET and WPIX said they will appeal, calling
the decision "a loss for the entire creative community."
ABC, CBS, NBC and their lawyers did not immediately respond
to requests for comment.
Diller, whose IAC/InterActive Corp provided $20.5
million of start-up financing for Aereo, welcomed the decision.
"Of course I'm happy the judge denied the injunction, and
now we can really begin telling television consumers they have
an alternative," he said. Diller sits on Aereo's board.
Nathan agreed that Aereo will damage the broadcasters'
ability to negotiate advertising and retransmission agreements,
given that the service could artificially lower Nielsen
viewership ratings and force concessions.
She also said Aereo could reduce traffic to websites of the
broadcasters themselves, damaging relationships with content
providers and advertisers there.
But Nathan also said Aereo, in addition to facing the risk
of closure, could lose employees, the ability to attract new
investors, customer goodwill, and its "substantial investments"
in the service.
"The balance of hardships certainly does not tip decidedly
in favor of (the broadcasters)," she wrote.
The cases are American Broadcasting Cos. et al v. Aereo Inc,
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No.
12-01540; and WNET et al v. Aereo Inc in the same court, No.