* Bank loan-loss provisioning an accounting concern
* Watchdog says broader review must bring improvements
* FRC to consult on new transparency rule
By Huw Jones
LONDON, May 28 Accountants who check the books
of Britain's banks must sharpen their act or could be ordered to
take corrective measures, the sector's watchdog said in a report
showing how a core lesson from the financial crisis has yet to
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) said in its annual
audit quality inspections report that there was a significant
improvement in audits of listed companies in general, but the
banking sector continued to lag.
"The overall grading of bank and building society audits is,
and continues to be, generally below those of other types of
entity," the FRC said.
The inspections during 2013 and 2014 covered audits for the
year that ended December 2012. They included the books of five
banks and five building societies, all unnamed and none were
"good" - the top grading - while 56 percent needed improvements.
In particular there was no significant improvement in how
accountants check the way banks set aside capital to cover
souring loans, known as loan-loss provisioning.
Too low levels of capital forced taxpayers to shore up
lenders during the 2007-09 financial crisis. It also prompted
policymakers to ask auditors why they gave banks a clean bill of
health just months before they had to be rescued.
"Weaknesses in the testing of loan impairment models and
related assumptions were key issues," the FRC said in the
"Insufficient challenge of management or the failure to
obtain further evidence to support provisioning judgements were
common themes in the issues identified."
Britain's competition watchdog and the European Union are
bringing in rules forcing companies to change accountants more
frequently to avoid cozy relationships and failure by
accountants to question what they are told by customers.
Paul George, the FRC's executive director for conduct, is
looking for a "step change" in audit quality at banks when the
FRC publishes the results of a separate broad review of bank
book-keeping in the autumn.
"If we do not see the level of progress that we expect then
clearly enforcement would be something we would need to
consider," George told Reuters.
The FRC announced the separate review of 13 banking audits
in December in a bid to focus the minds of auditors as they
checked banks' financial statements for 2013.
It came after routine inspections by the FRC were not
providing "sufficient incentives" for accountants to improve
their work at banks.
"The headline message is that the firms took our concerns in
December 2013 very seriously and have sought to take actions to
address those points but it is too early to assess whether those
actions have been effective," George said.
The FRC does not name the banks and other firms whose
accounts it reviews annually but this could change.
Britain's competition watchdog has recommended that audit
committees at companies say if the FRC has inspected the
accounts and what the outcome is.
George said the FRC supports transparency and will launch a
public consultation later this year on how audit committees
might report to shareholders on accounting concerns.
(Reporting by Huw Jones; Editing by Susan Fenton)