(The author is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed
are his own.)
By Gerard Wynn
LONDON May 8 Morocco is set to pay more for its
solar power than far richer countries such as Germany and should
switch tack to cheaper solar technologies that can compete
better with wind, oil and coal.
The higher cost can probably be attributed to its choice of
concentrated solar power (CSP), the competitiveness of which is
being questioned as prices of rival photovoltaic (PV) technology
Morocco plans to install at least 2,000 megawatts (MW) of
solar power capacity by 2020 at five sites, which it hopes will
account for 14 percent of total power generating capacity by the
end of the decade.
It will target both CSP and solar PV in its Moroccan Plan
for Solar Energy, or "Solar Plan", according to the Moroccan
Investment Development Agency, but has so far veered towards
more expensive CSP at one initial project near the southern city
That contrasts with how developers in California have
increasingly ditched CSP for PV over the past three years as a
global manufacturing glut sent PV costs plummeting.
CSP uses parabolic or other types of mirrors to concentrate
sunlight and create heat and steam to drive a turbine. It is a
technology championed by power equipment producers in Spain,
Morocco's neighbour and one of its closest diplomatic allies.
Solar PV converts sunlight directly into electricity using a
light-sensitive semiconductor such as silicon.
Morocco would do well to switch to PV, given a far more
developed supply chain, commoditised end product and competitive
power generation, especially given that the country's economic
troubles make it riskier to experiment with less widely used
Moroccan authorities anticipated the solar plan would cost
$9 billion at its launch in 2009, according to data on the
website of the north African country's solar energy agency,
The plan will be part-financed by a $1 billion Energy
Development Fund, including donations from the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
Morocco has raised additional funds for the first Ouarzazate
project from institutions including the European Investment
Bank, the French Development Agency (AFD) and the German
development bank KfW.
The plan will be delivered through 25-year power purchase
agreements (PPA) with independent power producers which earn a
fixed rate per unit of solar power they generate.
The aim is to achieve greater energy independence: Morocco
is one of the world's most energy-poor countries, importing
around 95 percent of its needs, according to the World Bank.
Energy accounts for more than a quarter of the country's
imports and contributed to a record trade deficit of $23.6
billion last year.
Sun-drenched Morocco wants eventually to export its solar
energy to Europe.
The U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has
developed an open-access database measuring solar irradiance
calculated according to the sunlight captured by a panel tilted
southwards, defined in units of kilowatt hours per square metre
The NREL's map shows a maximum "Direct Normal Irradiance"
(DNI) in southwest Germany of 3.39, compared with 7.47 at
Ouarzazate in Morocco. (See Chart 1)
It shows that the Moroccan project should achieve far more
competitive power generation.
But Morocco announced last September that it had awarded a
group led by Saudi International Company for Water and Power
(ACWA) a $1 billion contract to build a 160-megawatt (MW) CSP
plant, at 1.62 dirham ($0.194) per kilowatt hour.
ACWA last week confirmed further details including the award
of construction contracts.
That is more support than for smaller PV installations in
Germany, at 0.134 euros ($0.18) per kWh for projects up to 10
MW, and in Britain, at 0.115 pounds ($0.18) for projects above
250 kilowatts, both of which are over 20 rather than 25 years.
Germany has scrapped support for projects over 10 MW.
Chart 1: goo.gl/Kks9E
Chart 2: (page 4) goo.gl/EA54k
CSP VS PV
One way to compare costs of PV relative to CSP is using a
measure called levelised cost of energy (LCOE), based on total
lifetime costs and energy generation.
Germany's Fraunhofer Institute last year published a
detailed LCOE study including a comparison of CSP and PV costs
in North Africa, where its central estimate for CSP at 0.163
euros ($0.21) closely matched the contract subsequently agreed
The Fraunhofer analysis found that CSP was almost twice as
expensive as solar PV and three times more so than wind, and
forecast it would remain far more costly than PV through 2030.
"A considerable reduction in costs in recent years has given
PV installations a cost advantage over CSP plants at the same
location," it concluded.
Masen is aiming to install some 500 MW capacity at its
Ouarzazate site, and to start commissioning this by 2015.
The project will be delivered in three parts: an initial 160
MW of CSP using conventional parabolic mirrors (the contract now
awarded), and two subsequent phases for 300 MW of CSP including
a project using innovative solar tower technology which is even
That appears to leave less than 50 MW for solar PV.
The main advantage of CSP is its ability to control when the
energy is released for consumption.
The first contracted CSP plant at Ouarzazate in Morocco will
provide three hours of storage, according to a press release
published by MASEN on Jan. 23, meaning it can tweak output to
match consumer demand like a conventional power plant.
PV electricity must be consumed at the instant of generation
unless the grid has some kind of storage such as pumped
But the ability to store solar power, known as
dispatchability, is hardly a priority at this early stage when
Morocco's grid is dominated by dispatchable coal and oil-fired
Masen's plan to export some of its solar power to Europe via
Spain to help plug the trade deficit appears far-fetched given
how expensive it will be to produce.
At the agreed price, the solar power may also be a drain on
the Moroccan budget if the government has to cover any gap
between the cost of producing solar electricity and the price
the state power utility will pay.
($1 = 0.7642 euros)
($1 = 0.6464 British pounds)
(Reporting by Gerard Wynn; Editing by Tom Pfeiffer)