Evidence points to no security risk in Petraeus affair

Comments (2)
Arkie wrote:

The flap that is being made of this is so hypocritical of the Dems. It also makes me wonder what is really going on behind all this. What did Petraeus or Allen do to PO the White House? History shows that Clinton committed much more serious indiscretions while president, and yet was defended to the hilt with arguments and attitudes that are destructive to the moral fabric of our culture. Now one decorated loyal member of the U.S. Armed Forces resigns a post that is a political key to maintain liberty and another gets villified because he calls a married socialite “sweetheart” in an email. The Dem leadership is giving us nothing but pandering toward their self-righteousness in the whole affair. Where is the prevailing moral authority in this country? . . . Hollywood? . . . Politicians? , , , Media? . . . Wall Street? . . . This country obviously needs a righteous moral compass and leadership to keep it at the forefront of cultural direction. The only thing I hear that everybody wants to support is that “things have ot be fair for everybody”. Give me a break! Foolish and immature and just plain out of touch with reality.

Nov 16, 2012 8:13am EST  --  Report as abuse
ConstFundie wrote:

@Arkie, Yes, more righteous moral leadership in the form of adulterers and “good Christians” championing a platform of Greed.

Nov 16, 2012 3:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.