Shifting account of CIA's Libya talking points fuels Rice controversy

Comments (2)
Randy549 wrote:

If this story is accurate it would appear to exonerate Rice. If there is proof that the talking points given to her prior to appearing on the news shows did not mention al-Qaeda, then objections to her being Secretary of State based on suspicion of her altering the narrative herself, are unfounded.

It’s still fair to want to know how the talking points did get modified, but that’s not related to Rice’s role in this.

Nov 29, 2012 10:37am EST  --  Report as abuse
totherepublic wrote:

obama, clinton, petraeus, clapper, rice, reid, and others. They all knew the truth with in 24 hours or sooner and covered it up by lying. Now they are just lying to cover for each other. Two of the players are conveniently out of the lime light now, clinton and petraeus (they know the most), they can run but they can not hide forever. That is why it is called a conspiracy. It will unravel though, it already has begun. Use some common sense and you will not be on the wrong side of this when it all comes down.

Nov 29, 2012 11:01am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.