Child support claim rankles sperm donor to lesbian couple

Comments (11)

what a naieve person. you walk in crap and you’ll get it all over you. you just cant get involved with these kind of people.

Jan 03, 2013 9:13am EST  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:

I guess there are some very good reasons to be a sperm donor. However, in my view, excepting only some very few unique situations, THE REASONS TO NOT DO IT, FAR OUTWEIGH THEM!

Jan 03, 2013 10:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
Overcast451 wrote:

*”This was totally unexpected,” Marotta said in a phone interview. “The very first thing that went through my mind was that no good deed goes unpunished.”*

It could be debated at the merit of a ‘good deed’ – that involved selling sperm on Craigslist.

At least these ladies are lucky he didn’t have some kind of disease.

Anyway dude – if they press the issue – file for custody, since the parents can’t provide for the child, it should be easy.

Jan 03, 2013 10:33am EST  --  Report as abuse
GazelleDZ wrote:

“William Marotta, 46, donated sperm to Jennifer Schreiner and Angela Bauer under a written agreement that he would not be considered the father of the child nor liable for child support.”

Whether verbal statements or written document, an agreement between persons constitutes a legal contract. Three people agreed to certain conditions earlier which is no different than any of the myriads of ways we humans agree to certain things in the course of our lives. It would appear that it is the two women who have violated their agreement with Marotta. A change in the women’s circumstances does not void the orginal agreement made.

Jan 03, 2013 10:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
bobber1956 wrote:

GazelleDZ
You forget changing their minds is a womans poragative. Like Jack Nicholson said when asked how it is he understands women so well, “Take a man and remove all reason and accountability”. The leagal contract, written or verbal, is worthless…espcially if the judge is a woman.

No I am not a sexist or a bigot. I am just not going to compromise the truth for politically correct lies any longer. Something another great MAN said, “Diplomacy is just another word for deception”. Winston Churchill.

Jan 03, 2013 11:03am EST  --  Report as abuse
FatherJames wrote:

Did anybody read the story? The *women* have not “changed their minds…” The *government* has chosen to ignore the contract. In one way, this is understandable… For example… while a court is generally bound by a “pre-nuptial” agreement during a divorce… its findings regarding child custody and so on are determined only by the interests of the child…

The problem for the government is that it came in on the other side of the issue regarding child custody… and that sets a precedent in law. But until this gets sorted out… anybody considering such donation would be well advised to do it through a doctor or sperm bank…

Jan 03, 2013 11:56am EST  --  Report as abuse

No FatherJames, few people read before they spew their comments out on the internet.

I shook my head as each one of those commenting unloaded their bias and disdain on a man they never met who was trying to help a couple by donating his sperm for free. You know, the point of the story…

Then bobber, the prolific misogynist gun toting Obama hater, quotes Jack Nicholson of all people, as he displays his disdain toward women and lack of reading comprehension. (reason and accountability are NOT jack’s forte)

Bobby, diplomacy is another word for restraint. Winston was a misogynist old drunk womanizer… who was respected my other men because he got his liquid courage to be less than politically correct and speak his mind. (Hmmm Nicolson seems to be close to that title as well, so I see a theme here) The fact that Winston failed more often than not seems to be lost… because he was a great orator and BSer, which makes for great quotes to use in a comment section.

Let me sum it up for bobber. After the man donated for free, his sperm, the woman were not doing well financially so requested assistance. The Government pressured the woman to reveal the father’s name because the sperm donation didn’t go through proper channels and the man is by law the father of the child and the child welfare is the law’s main interest. The sperm donor is not upset with the women as they still speak.

Jan 03, 2013 3:24pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mbgodofwar wrote:

The women should either drop their claim or sign an agreement to pay back the man. Nice to know that government doesn’t honor contracts; brings SO much trust!

Jan 04, 2013 11:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Ancalimon wrote:

Those women could have done much more to protect his identity. But they do have much more to gain by giving him up, don’t they.

Also, even if he is found to be liable for child support, it would be easy for them to return the money immediately after he has paid the child support payment.

I would be interested to know if he can go after them in civil court for breach of contract for failing to uphold their end of the bargain.

Jan 07, 2013 8:46am EST  --  Report as abuse
RealNeil wrote:

This story should give pause to those considering a such a donation to a female couple.
Donating through a licensed physician will cost more to do, but being safe from state government harassment in the future is worth the expense. Also, if these ladies could not afford to care for a child, having to obtain sperm through normal channels might have ruled them out until their finances were sound.

Jan 07, 2013 1:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Otrere wrote:

I remember reading about another sperm donor/lesbian case where the donor was one of the women’s brother. The ruling in that case was that the other “mother” was responsible for child support since it was she who delivered the sperm via a turkey baster. The court held that it was the one who planted the seed who was responsible for the baby.

Jan 07, 2013 2:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.