Reid, Panetta, Dempsey defend Obama's Pentagon nominee

Comments (10)
Thomas269 wrote:

Thank goodness that there is no Jewish lobby weighing in on the nomination.

Feb 03, 2013 9:38am EST  --  Report as abuse
Raelyn wrote:

Panetta is right. These crazed conservatives cannot look ahead or adjust to the present — it is all getting even for losing the election. I remember hoping McCain would be president, now it is a huge relief that he wasn’t. This is one Republican/conservative embarrassed by my party. I think I will join the Green Party.

Feb 03, 2013 9:56am EST  --  Report as abuse
SanPa wrote:

US enemies will hurl more than sticks and stones. Hagel showed that he lost or lacked the ability to remain in control under pressure. DOD is not the job for the faint of conviction.

Feb 03, 2013 10:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
victor672 wrote:

Panetta, the notorious promoter of homosexuality in our military. Thanks for ruining our armed forces, Leon-the-loser.

Feb 03, 2013 10:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
zhanyeye wrote:

He does not support Israel with eyes closed, you know he will be attacked by Israel supporters.

Feb 03, 2013 10:57am EST  --  Report as abuse
BioStudies wrote:

It seems like the main requirement by the Obama administration is that you be a terrible choice for the job.

Feb 03, 2013 12:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BioStudies wrote:

It seems like the main requirement by the Obama administration is that you be a terrible choice for the job.

Feb 03, 2013 12:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BioStudies wrote:

It seems like the main requirement by the Obama administration is that you be a terrible choice for the job.

Feb 03, 2013 12:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Parker1227 wrote:

Hagel was shockingly uninformed and confused throughout the hearing. If he STILL gets appointed to head the pentagon then shame on the senate.

Feb 03, 2013 2:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
victor672 wrote:

Dempsey has no choice but to go along. He’s essentially a puppet of the Bozo-in-Chief.

Feb 03, 2013 3:45pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.