Internet giants deny granting government 'direct access' to servers

Comments (20)
totherepublic wrote:

The more and louder they deny it the more true it is…we learned that from the obama administration.

Jun 06, 2013 9:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PaulOwens wrote:

So, they do not let them walk up to the server insert usb and download. What about virtual access? What about indirect access?

We do not provide direct access. No further questions… scurring away quickly…

Jun 06, 2013 9:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bel47 wrote:

Either way, both you lost trust.

Jun 06, 2013 9:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mixup wrote:

Our government will “request” access to the servers in order to find out what the Chinese have already learned by hacking the same servers.

Jun 06, 2013 9:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Blake3 wrote:

“direct access”, indirect access, i c wat u did thar

Jun 06, 2013 9:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
iAussie wrote:

Security agencies work in secret offline, so why would it be any different online?, especially when 95% of western homes have at least one computer, it’s the ultimate surveillance tool for spy agencies, law enforcement.. (in-case you do a future crime they have logs). One would have to be naive to think we aren’t all monitored, logged. The companies either don’t know anything because knowledge would be above their highest level, or they don’t have a choice in the matter because it falls under post 911 terrorism laws, so there would be no need to ask and denial is easier when it’s sold to you in the ‘interest of national security’. Plus, any company to admit being a back-door to a spy agency would be corporate suicide. Always assume you are monitored and logged when online. Just because it’s a conspiracy theory doesn’t mean it isn’t true. I believe the Washington Post, absolutely. WikiLeaks showed us another world that goes on within the world that we know. If there was nothing to hide, Julian Assange wouldn’t be where he is. But more importantly, where are they holding the aliens?

Jun 06, 2013 9:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
derdutchman wrote:

That’s a tough one. On the one hand you have the internet giants of the ages and on the other you have the Washington Post, home of the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Janet Cooke. Gee, Forest, could this be another box of chocolates?

Jun 06, 2013 9:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Life1 wrote:

My Blackberry is looking pretty good to me right now…

Jun 06, 2013 9:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
THeRmoNukE wrote:

No foolin’ Reuters! Wow, imagine that, all these companies deny granting access. You forgot the part where a secret court illegally grants permission for NSA to just hack right in!

Jun 06, 2013 10:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
THeRmoNukE wrote:

@Life1- Why, you aren’t synced with a Windows or iOS desktop?

Jun 06, 2013 10:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ARJTurgot2 wrote:

My Facebook account advocates ritual human sacrifice of politicians. Think they’re monitoring this post. Now, all your IPs are belonging to us.

Jun 06, 2013 10:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mb56 wrote:

It is difficult to take any of these assertions at face value since under the Patriot Act they could all be under a gag order not to disclose such information. Unfortunately, I afraid that the government has finally reached the tipping point with all it’s secrecy – it is no longer possible for the citizens to have any faith in what they are being told.

Jun 06, 2013 10:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TheNewWorld wrote:

@totherepublic

I doubt it. Microsoft is protecting of customer’s privacy when compared to Google and Apple. I am sure they all cooperate with requests, but they would not want to give direct access to their information to anyone.

Jun 06, 2013 10:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
WJL wrote:

Big brother USA 2013

Jun 06, 2013 11:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Life1 wrote:

@Thermonuke: Nope. Runs all on its lonesome…

Jun 06, 2013 11:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Runjan_Jain wrote:

Direct server access or not, the NSA can easily get any data that they want by simply certifying that the requested data is for national security purposes. Effectively, they have access to all data at these companies.

Jun 06, 2013 11:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Runjan_Jain wrote:

Good luck getting anything useful from Microsoft..I can’t even search my own inbox on outlook.com or hotmail effectively.

Jun 06, 2013 11:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Yamayoko wrote:

There’s no incentive or coercion that these internet companies would co-operate with U.S. government to invade privacy this way. But such invasion may be involuntary and unnoticed. Washington Post is short on ISP’s motivation but its speculation is not totally groundless.

Jun 06, 2013 11:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
CF137 wrote:

Oh gee…really? So like, wow, you mean these types of big companies WOULD actually just come right out and tell us if they WERE actually doing something this heinous to us? Great! And Yes, I just fell off the turnip truck yesterday, and I’m proud of it!

Sincerely,
An average American citizen

Jun 06, 2013 12:07am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ChicagoFats wrote:

If you utter the word “bomb” out loud in an airport you can expect to be arrested. If it gets to the point where the equivalent type of communication on an internet connection results in a knock on the door, we’ll know the extent of the damage to our freedom.

Jun 06, 2013 12:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.