United States sending more troops and tanks to South Korea

Comments (6)
nose2066 wrote:

Aren’t tanks and troop carriers sort of old fashioned? Wouldn’t the U.S. and South Korea just repel an attack with drones firing rockets? Or long range missles? Or equally old fashioned long range artillery, but much safer for the troops, since they would be further back from the enemy?

Jan 07, 2014 7:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SaveRMiddle wrote:

Tell us again….we’re too broke for US infrastructure or jobless aid.

Jan 07, 2014 7:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
indymind wrote:

Troops and tanks apparently sent to South Korea in order to extricate Dennis Rodman’s big foot from his big mouth in North Korea.

Jan 07, 2014 7:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
indymind wrote:

Troops and tanks apparently sent to South Korea in order to extricate Dennis Rodman’s big foot from his big mouth in North Korea.

Jan 07, 2014 7:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
MikeBarnett wrote:

The US has been in a legal state of war with North Korea for 63.5 years. Odummy is adding 800 US targets (troops) to the 28,000 already there. We have increased our force there by 2.9%. Are we finally going to launch the big offensive to end the war? If not, why are we sending more ground troops? Doesn’t our Idiot in Chief understand that North Korea’s main weapons are missiles, and all he is doing is sending more targets? Of course, the true purpose may be to allow Odummy to have more photo ops to prove that he is tough. On the other hand, if he is finally going to try and negotiate an end to America’s longest war (63.5 years and counting), then I may owe him an apology, but I won’t bet on it until I see it.

Jan 07, 2014 7:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
simian wrote:

sure, why not? we have plenty of money to get up in everybody else’s business, right?

Jan 08, 2014 12:31pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.