Dinesh D'Souza indicted for violating U.S. election law

Comments (106)
JPTravis1 wrote:

Message from the Justice Dept.: criticize Obama and the government will come after you. Same message being sent by the IRS, EPA, and FEC. Welcome to Amerika.

Jan 23, 2014 6:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
cactus02 wrote:

The Feds have zero tolerance for Republican violations, Democrats are a different story. There is never any compelling evidence, even if more votes are cast than residents in the district.

Jan 23, 2014 6:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Leeam wrote:

Sure, limit individuals. We wouldn’t want to impede on corporate interests.

Jan 23, 2014 6:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Marly wrote:

So what. Dems do this all the time.

Jan 23, 2014 6:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Marly wrote:

So what. Dems do this all the time.

Jan 23, 2014 6:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
thelastrebel wrote:

Do you think all Obama’s money was legal? They did something with credit cards to get all that money from Soros.

Jan 23, 2014 6:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
LibSick wrote:

When do the indictments of Obama ‘bundlers’ start coming down?

Jan 23, 2014 6:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
desertsunset wrote:

This administration is waging an all-out attack on Conservatives and Republicans and all we hear are crickets from the MSM and GOP leaders. Pathetic.

Jan 23, 2014 6:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
desertsunset wrote:

This administration is waging an all-out attack on Conservatives and Republicans and all we hear are crickets from the MSM and GOP leaders. Pathetic.

Jan 23, 2014 6:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
callycat wrote:

O.K. Sooooo why hasn’t the A.F.L-C.I.O. been indicted yet? Hummmmm?

Jan 23, 2014 6:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
lauranyc wrote:

Jeez, with all the corruption and crony capitalism in NY he goes after this film maker. I’d be impressed if he looked into DeBlasio’s funding .

Jan 23, 2014 6:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
KarlQ wrote:

Presidential pique… shame on the use of the IRS and FBI to promote politically selective BS like this…. over $20,000 ….while ignoring the $11 MILLION billionaire currency manipulator George Soros contributed to Obama’s election.

Politics CORRUPTS. It should be illegal for people to run for office if they had worked in government within the prior 10 years. If you are not actually productively contributing in the American society, you lack the experience necessary to lead in an executive OR legislative position. The current so-called “leaders” in the WH and congress provide ample examples of why we need this rule!

Jan 23, 2014 6:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Iceeu2 wrote:

If they “take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process”, what did they do about all the voter fraud that went on in 2008 and again in 2012. They’re about as big a joke as what we’ve got in the White House.

Jan 23, 2014 6:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jeffersonite wrote:

Reminds me of the difference between ethics and morals I heard once: “An ethical man believes it’s wrong to cheat on his wife. A moral man–doesn’t.”

Jan 23, 2014 6:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
ExSF wrote:

What about the New Black Panther Party intimidating voters in Philadelphia during the 2008 presidential election? We’re still waiting for that indictment.

Jan 23, 2014 6:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Malama wrote:

Isn’t that rich!? From a regime that fights to allow their stooges to steal votes, hinder Conservative groups and suppress the military vote… they have a problem with D’Souza?

When with this Stazi style ThugTocrisy end?

Jan 23, 2014 6:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
fritz62a wrote:

If you want to criticize major political figures, you better make sure you are playing by the rules yourself. I do find the jab at his hypocrisy over marriage, and it truly is, unnecessary. It makes reuters seem partisan.

Jan 23, 2014 6:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AdamH wrote:

George Soros should be in prison years ago then.

Jan 23, 2014 6:58pm EST  --  Report as abuse
IllKeepMine wrote:

Sure, prosecute a Republican that provides jobs in the film industry, but ignore the Black Panther intimidating voters at the polling place.

Jan 23, 2014 7:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
IllKeepMine wrote:

Sure, prosecute a Republican that provides jobs in the film industry, but ignore the Black Panther intimidating voters at the polling place.

Jan 23, 2014 7:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
malus419 wrote:

“In late 2012, D’Souza resigned his post as president of King’s College, a small Christian college in New York City, after admitting he had become engaged to a woman even though he was legally married, though separated from his wife. He has been an outspoken defender of traditional marriage.”

This is almost laughably off-topic. Hate republicans much, Mr. Stempel?

Jan 23, 2014 7:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
margiel wrote:

The FBI is doing exactly what Christie is accused of; they do it openly without shame. They will continue to attack Obysmal’s opposition until the opposition dies.

Jan 23, 2014 7:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
MsCharlie wrote:

Talk about laugh out loud funny…spoken by an Obama appointee. Right, totally believable. “As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process,” the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan, Preet Bharara, said in a statement released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Jan 23, 2014 7:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Malama wrote:

How about the 100′s of thousands of votes stolen & suppressed that got Obama re-elected? Meh!

Jan 23, 2014 7:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Shrugged wrote:

The article stated, “”As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process,” the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan, Preet Bharara, said in a statement released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Bharara is an Obama appointee.”

How many minority voters have you caught and prosecuted fro voting multiple times in the 2012 election Mr Bhararra???

Remember the lady in Ohio who admitted on TV she voted 6 times?? It was confirmed she voted 6 times as she stated. Did the US Attorney in Ohio pursue this case?? Is she in Jail today???? Don’t recall a single article of FBI pursuit and follow-up.

Double standard. Liars and cheaters. That’s Obama’s America

Jan 23, 2014 7:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RHO1953 wrote:

Too funny. They have shown no interest in checking into the precincts where every single vote went to Obama, which is an impossibility, or the ones where turnout was as high as 140% of registered voters. The real corruption is in the Justice Department and this regime.

Jan 23, 2014 7:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
ML-NJ wrote:

L O L !!!

Welcome to 2016: Obama’s America.

These $*&#^@!s are so obvious. Patriots are watching.

Jan 23, 2014 7:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
J.D.Still wrote:

The left has learned their lessons well from the Nazi’s

Jan 23, 2014 7:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
philster7656 wrote:

If D’Souza is 52 years old, that means he was 19 when Reagan took office and 27 when Reagan left office. He may very well have worked in the Reagan White House, but I suspect it’s a little bit of a stretch to call him “a former policy advisor to President Ronald Reagan.”

Makes me think the indictment could be a stretch, too.

Jan 23, 2014 7:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TripleA60 wrote:

Our government is at war with conservative America and being enabled by the media…

Jan 23, 2014 7:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mrgraywolf wrote:

Good thing the administration isn’t vindictive or misusing their power cause that would be a felony.

Jan 23, 2014 7:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
djw663 wrote:

“As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process,” the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan, Preet Bharara, said in a statement released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Bharara is an Obama appointee.

5 Pinocchio’s

Jan 23, 2014 7:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
MarianoP wrote:

Should have been a bundler for Obama and he might be on his way to Norway: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/23/obama-bundler-norway_n_4652066.html

Jan 23, 2014 7:21pm EST  --  Report as abuse
slomerv wrote:

Anyone surprised? This is what communists do. They are dropping the patient progressive mask and going full communist now. Speak out at your peril. Forget the bill of rights. They are smarter than us and they will tell us what we can have. For our own good of course. Speaking against the Messiah is blasphemy. Get your prison camp go bag ready folks.

Jan 23, 2014 7:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Booradley999 wrote:

Why do Democrats always get away with murder and your tax dollars?

Jan 23, 2014 7:24pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BB123 wrote:

He should have just bought 10,000 copies of the candidate’s book, like everyone else does.

Jan 23, 2014 7:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
furrpiece wrote:

Nothing to see here. Just another case of the Obamunists using government resources to strike back at someone who criticizes Obam.

Jan 23, 2014 7:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
WinstonHibler wrote:

“As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process,”. What a huge, bald-faced lie. What about the New Black Panthers in Philadelphia? What about Al Franken and all the prisoner ballots? What about all the precincts in Ohio and Pennsylvania that had more votes than registered voters and 100% vote counts for Obama? Et cetera, et cetera, ad nauseam…

Jan 23, 2014 7:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TexanSense wrote:

The Long Knifes are out!

Most likely is guilty. However, one has to wonder why Obama and many another Democrat do not even face scrutiny from the Justice Department. There is certainly enough circumstantial evidence for many. And some have been given a pass.

Don’t believe it prudent to name names however, many of you will know to whom I speak.

Jan 23, 2014 7:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TexanSense wrote:

The Long Knifes are out!

Most likely is guilty. However, one has to wonder why Obama and many another Democrat do not even face scrutiny from the Justice Department. There is certainly enough circumstantial evidence for many. And some have been given a pass.

Don’t believe it prudent to name names however, many of you will know to whom I speak.

Jan 23, 2014 7:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TexanSense wrote:

The Long Knifes are out!

Most likely is guilty. However, one has to wonder why Obama and many another Democrat do not even face scrutiny from the Justice Department. There is certainly enough circumstantial evidence for many. And some have been given a pass.

Don’t believe it prudent to name names however, many of you will know to whom I speak.

Jan 23, 2014 7:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TexanSense wrote:

The Long Knifes are out!

Most likely is guilty. However, one has to wonder why Obama and many another Democrat do not even face scrutiny from the Justice Department. There is certainly enough circumstantial evidence for many. And some have been given a pass.

Don’t believe it prudent to name names however, many of you will know to whom I speak.

Jan 23, 2014 7:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
davidkachel wrote:

“U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York”
It seems one he!! of a lot of injustice comes out of that court. In some cases, a certain female judge even instructs juries that “you WILL find this person guilty”.
Worse, prosecutors have been caught red-handed manufacturing evidence and the defendant STILL gets found guilty!!!

Jan 23, 2014 7:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
marcs2 wrote:

totally political. in martin county fl. usa 160,000 voted with only 140,000 registered and the democrat won.
no problem there!
the usa is looking more and more like a banana republic minus the bananas under this regime.

Jan 23, 2014 7:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Rushell wrote:

Boy,somebody got it right. If a Democrat did such as D’Souza it would certainly not make the news, much less an indictment! Just think about Obama having no-limit credit card donations from anywhere in the world at his election times.

Jan 23, 2014 7:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Rushell wrote:

Boy,somebody got it right. If a Democrat did such as D’Souza it would certainly not make the news, much less an indictment! Just think about Obama having no-limit credit card donations from anywhere in the world at his election times.

Jan 23, 2014 7:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Rushell wrote:

Boy,somebody got it right. If a Democrat did such as D’Souza it would certainly not make the news, much less an indictment! Just think about Obama having no-limit credit card donations from anywhere in the world at his election times.

Jan 23, 2014 7:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Rushell wrote:

Boy,somebody got it right. If a Democrat did such as D’Souza it would certainly not make the news, much less an indictment! Just think about Obama having no-limit credit card donations from anywhere in the world at his election times.

Jan 23, 2014 7:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Bob_Oscar wrote:

This is the “shove” part of the progressive *nudge, shove, shoot* program. If this doesn’t work, the next conservative will likely be the victim of a *mysterious* accident.

Its beginning to get rough out here…if you are conservative, watch your back…

Jan 23, 2014 7:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
lamchops wrote:

Meanwhile, Jon Corzine walks free; Eric Holder, the Attorney General of The United States of America purgers himself before congress, and the head of the IRS pleads the Fifth.

Look, over there, teabaggers waving around tiny little copies of the Constitution!!! Be afraid, be very afraid!

Jan 23, 2014 7:45pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Perceptions2 wrote:

“As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process,” the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan, Preet Bharara, said in a statement released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Bharara is an Obama appointee.

Unless of course you are talking about Obama abusing the IRS to intimidate conservatives, or cooking unemployment numbers on the eve of the election, or covering up Benghazi, or Black Panthers intimidating people at polling locations…

Jan 23, 2014 7:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse

NSA and Obama listening in on Dinesh and then they pass off info to 3rd party so their hands are clean.

Obama is and has done way worse. But he is the dictator. He gets to squash anyone he wants.

Dinesh is a victim of selective prosecution.

Jan 23, 2014 7:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse

NSA and Obama listening in on Dinesh and then they pass off info to 3rd party so their hands are clean.

Obama is and has done way worse. But he is the dictator. He gets to squash anyone he wants.

Dinesh is a victim of selective prosecution.

Jan 23, 2014 7:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Nothing4Free wrote:

Give me a break. Obama has turned our country into a third-world dictatorship. Who is America to complain about political prisoners when this BS is going on?

Jan 23, 2014 7:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
roughman wrote:

Foul!

IMPEACH THE PRETENDER NOW!

Jan 23, 2014 7:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
marcs2 wrote:

when i was young only members of the mafia took the fifth before congress.
now it is members of the executive branch, ATF,IRS and i have probably left off some.

Jan 23, 2014 8:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
matinee55 wrote:

kkk

Jan 23, 2014 8:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
tntallen6 wrote:

“As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process”. What a freaking JOKE. There is corruption that goes all the way to the top. Make no mistake–this is PAYBACK for making the movie 2016: Obama’s America. God bless you Dinesh. We will be praying for you!

Jan 23, 2014 8:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Brianbkseller wrote:

I look forward with great enthusiasm to the continuing efforts of U.S. attorney Preet Bharara as he wades through these terrible, awful bad guys …… maybe, eventually, by accident(?) a democratic ?

Jan 23, 2014 8:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Joseph666 wrote:

i’m really starting to believe rumors (conspiracy theories) that I heard in 2009. For GE Capital to get bailed out (for a total of 340 billion) during TARP they gave this administration the right to appoint whomever they wanted to NBC and MSNBC. They stacked the networks with people either from their administration or married to someone in their administration.

Jan 23, 2014 8:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
wayzupusc wrote:

When’s John Corzine get indicted? Or those in the IRS responsible for targeting conservative groups and tea party? The list goes on and on and on…

The hypocrisy in our government is appalling as it is obvious – they don’t even try to hide it anymore.

Jan 23, 2014 8:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse

The Obama administration is actively targeting anyone who opposes him using the DOJ, IRS, EPA, NSA, and every other department of the 4th branch of government. This is what tyranny looks like.

“If Congress won’t act, I will.” Barack Obama

No charges on the IRS, DoJ for Fast and Furious, Benghazi, NSA spying. No charges against anyone nor has anyone been held accountable under Obama. And he continues to act like a dictator changing laws at will, appointing radical judges, attacking Conservatives calling the terrorists, extremists, hostage takers.

This is a coup.

Jan 23, 2014 8:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
roccotool wrote:

Bahrara is an Obama appointee. That’s all you need to know out of that whole article.

Jan 23, 2014 8:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse

“As we have long said, this Office and the FBI take a zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process,” “Unless, of course, WE are corrupting the election ourselves.” In fact, there has never been a more corrupt government in this country since it actually became a country.

Jan 23, 2014 8:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
roccotool wrote:

“Zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process”. Did you hear that, Holder?

Jan 23, 2014 8:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
wyoming6 wrote:

Seems the Injustice Department is now openly persecuting any who appose comrade Hussein and his Marxist/muslim thugs. The FBI has been totally politicized and there can be no question that Eric “red” Holder does anything but uphold the law. The law no longer exists in this country, just as most of our rights have been taken. Hussein and his thugs are coming after any and all who oppose them. God help us, and help our once great nation.

Jan 23, 2014 8:09pm EST  --  Report as abuse

Why is the George Soros funded Progressive tax exempt site, Media Matters, been targeted by the IRS or DOJ. They are a Conservative hit job site filled with America hating left-wing radicals yet, not a word from the administration about them.

Jan 23, 2014 8:09pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Mike_Montana wrote:

Obama is above the law but anyone who dares to criticize
the Great Leader gets audited, indicted or Breitbarted.

Jan 23, 2014 8:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Screaming wrote:

Sounds like another Valerie retaliation to me.

Jan 23, 2014 8:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
LeonBelasco wrote:

“There is no voter fraud.”–Eric Holder

Jan 23, 2014 8:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
LeonBelasco wrote:

“There is no voter fraud.”–Eric Holder

Jan 23, 2014 8:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
LeonBelasco wrote:

“There is no voter fraud.”–Eric Holder

Jan 23, 2014 8:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
LeonBelasco wrote:

“There is no voter fraud.”–Eric Holder

Jan 23, 2014 8:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RioSam wrote:

What a travesty. This coming from an administration
that allowed a whole lot money contributions from the mid east
which is against the law.

Jan 23, 2014 8:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RioSam wrote:

What a travesty. This coming from an administration
that allowed a whole lot money contributions from the mid east
which is against the law.

Jan 23, 2014 8:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
drechris wrote:

Typical hypocrite republican. “I am a supporter of traditional marriage” but he’s committing adultery. “I am against latino voters committing voter fraud” but he’s paying people to vote. Let’s here it for the hypocrite republicans!

Jan 23, 2014 8:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Linda68 wrote:

I saw D’Souza’s movie “2016: Obama’s America” – based primarily from Obama’s book “Dreams from my father”, and numerous interviews with people close to Obama. It’s no surprise that Eric Holder and his minions have gone after D’Souza for daring to show Obama for the radical person he is. America is resembling more and more a banana republic which government will not tolerate any criticism.

Jan 23, 2014 8:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Linda68 wrote:

I saw D’Souza’s movie “2016: Obama’s America” – based primarily from Obama’s book “Dreams from my father”, and numerous interviews with people close to Obama. It’s no surprise that Eric Holder and his minions have gone after D’Souza for daring to show Obama for the radical person he is. America is resembling more and more a banana republic which government will not tolerate any criticism.

Jan 23, 2014 8:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
tampamom25 wrote:

Zero tolerance only applies to conservative Republicans. Liberal Democrats are given a free pass. Hypocritical sewage is running our country:o(

Jan 23, 2014 8:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
matinee5555 wrote:

leftist a hole AG, Odon’tknow & the leftist msm will have all conservatives in prison / camps soon!

Jan 23, 2014 8:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RandyP wrote:

Okay, we won’t enforce the borders. We don’t want people to show ID when voting. But we sure can prosecute this guy for a minor offense. Holder and Company running the thugocracy as they deem necessary.

Jan 23, 2014 8:31pm EST  --  Report as abuse
berentelerin wrote:

The only way for Dinesh to survive this is to sick the IRS on his enemies, while tapping their phones, so he can ignore their pleas for help, because they are about to be murdered by terrorists, who he can then blame on a video (that nobody saw). C’Mon! All Dinesh wanted to do was run some illegal guns to Mexico, so our citizens could be murdered by them. Then he could use the murders he was going to cause, to start the ban on the guns. Instead he’s accused of spreading some money around? It’s inexcusable! Maybe he can get ‘Barack The Inept’ to help him “get to the bottom of this”?

Jan 23, 2014 8:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Vince33x wrote:

Another example of how this FASCIST WhiteHouse and Left-Wing Jews are trying to stamp out dissent. There should be NO LAWS re how much anyone can contribute to a campaign because giving money to a campaign is a form of ‘speech.’ Thus, any restriction to giving is a restriction on speech. Those who do not see this are either thick or have a political ax to grind.

Jan 23, 2014 9:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Vince33x wrote:

Another example of how this FASCIST WhiteHouse and Left-Wing Jews are trying to stamp out dissent. There should be NO LAWS re how much anyone can contribute to a campaign because giving money to a campaign is a form of ‘speech.’ Thus, any restriction to giving is a restriction on speech. Those who do not see this are either thick or have a political ax to grind.

Jan 23, 2014 9:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Vince33x wrote:

Another example of how this FASCIST WhiteHouse and Left-Wing Jews are trying to stamp out dissent. There should be NO LAWS re how much anyone can contribute to a campaign because giving money to a campaign is a form of ‘speech.’ Thus, any restriction to giving is a restriction on speech. Those who do not see this are either thick or have a political ax to grind.

Jan 23, 2014 9:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jgreene wrote:

These totalitarian Marxists are going to start a civil war.

Jan 23, 2014 9:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Cnileolman wrote:

Another con who hates following the rules. What else is new. Cons can never be trusted. They will be the death of our great country.

Jan 23, 2014 9:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
IraqVet wrote:

You can shoot the messenger but you can’t kill the message.

Jan 23, 2014 9:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
IraqVet wrote:

…btw, great follow-up, Rueters, on Disaster Care and the IRS illegal targeting…thanks a bunch girlz.

Jan 23, 2014 9:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mcrognale wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxlhyX-4qKI

Jan 23, 2014 10:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
DaveCharlie wrote:

Wow- isn’t a crime to forge your selective service registration and your birth certificate in order to usurp the White House? Please don’t take my word for it, Sheriff Arpaio (Sheriff Joe) held two press conferences over a year ago proving that AKA Obama has forged credentials. Please, watch the press conferences for yourself. This document has links to the press conferences and related documents:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/183747136/Just-the-Facts-obama-forgeries-pdf

Peace. Prov 19:9

Jan 24, 2014 2:36am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.