Swiss vote to set limits on immigration from EU

Comments (29)
f00 wrote:

They put respect for their culture, their quality of life, and their children’s future, first. Strange folks.

Feb 09, 2014 9:24am EST  --  Report as abuse
PopeAlgore wrote:

Meanwhile in the USA, the Democrat party is feverishly working to destroy the country by giving Amnesty as a reward for sneaking into the USA to an endless flood of Illegal Immigrants… who will be voting Democrat every 4 years after that, of course.

Feb 09, 2014 10:19am EST  --  Report as abuse
AdamSmith wrote:

Congratulations to the people of Switzerland, on this historic day, for their vote to stop mass immigration.

Feb 09, 2014 1:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AdamSmith wrote:

Mass immigration into the USA, on an unprecedented scale, is having the same effects cited in Switzerland.
– It is driving up the cost of housing.
– It is increasing unemployment.
– It is destroying a wonderful culture, and quality of life.

Feb 09, 2014 1:43pm EST  --  Report as abuse
yubamary wrote:

Smart people the Swiss. Here we will just continue to let people ignore our laws. Pretty soon we will be giving amnesty if the current administration has it’s way. I don’t know why we even have immigration laws nobody seems to even try to obey them.

Feb 09, 2014 3:35pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RocketSurgeon wrote:

Switzerland has the best democracy in the World IMO. They get to decide on all important matters themselves. They don’t have to wait years for an election to choose a candidate based on hundreds of election promises, many of which are never kept, like the most of us.
The EU and the multinationals should always come second and third to voters in a democracy. The EU is not elected, and therefore not democratic, in my view.

Feb 09, 2014 3:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BigBobsAlot wrote:

Go figure. The EU loves to talk about Democracy but when citizens, not politicians, make popular decisions for the good of their nation, the elite vermin have a problem with Democracy. Real Democracy does not exist in the EU, the US, Canada, or anywhere else for that matter unless it agrees with the wealthy few running our nations for the benefit of their multinational companies.

Feb 09, 2014 3:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
RocketSurgeon wrote:

Switzerland has the best democracy in the World IMO. They get to decide on all important matters themselves. They don’t have to wait years for an election to choose a candidate based on hundreds of election promises, many of which are never kept, like the most of us.
The EU and the multinationals should always come second and third to voters in a democracy. The EU is not elected, and therefore not democratic, in my view.

Feb 09, 2014 3:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
beech wrote:

If only the US could be smart like the Swiss, this is a very good decision.

Feb 09, 2014 4:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Tiu wrote:

Some interesting comments from the descendants of the settlers of the new world about foreign invaders, oops immigrants.

Feb 09, 2014 4:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse

Too bad the morons in the United States don’t take a leaf out of Switzerland’s book and do the same thing here.

Feb 09, 2014 7:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Dieter77 wrote:

this is truly shocking…people WANT to move to switzerland???

Feb 09, 2014 8:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Greg373 wrote:

Great. I look forward to the EU putting strict immigration quotas on Swiss nationals too, to prevent too many of them coming to work here, as well as strict border checks to prevent them from entering the EU illegally.

Feb 09, 2014 9:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
techritter wrote:

Foreign born people in the US are only 13% of the population and illegal immigrants are only 3.5%. Hardly as big a problem as in Switzerland. And this –
– It is driving up the cost of housing.
– It is increasing unemployment.
– It is destroying a wonderful culture, and quality of life. (?????)

Could not be more wrong. Pure XENOPHOBIA

Feb 09, 2014 11:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
inMyView wrote:

Why would anyone want to immigrate to Switzerland anyway ?

Feb 10, 2014 2:26am EST  --  Report as abuse
HumbleThinker wrote:

The United Kingdom needs to learn from Switzerland.
http://iforecastuk.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/switzerland-no-taboo-on-immigration/

Feb 10, 2014 4:34am EST  --  Report as abuse
Kopi wrote:

Congratulations to the Swiss people!

This makes very good sense!

Thank you for standing up for the uniqueness ofyour country and itspeolpe and their race.
There is NO PLACE for non-similar people in ANY European country.

No, you did not shoot Switzerland in the foot by voting to limit immigrants. Your country was shot in the foot by those people who allowed thenon-racially similar people int Switzerland in the first place.

So thank you, Switzerland. You have set an example which we hope the whole of Europe will follow.

Feb 11, 2014 12:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

To techritter, Number one your numbers sound very low, sounds like you have listened to the Dems about how few illegals are in the USA, most people with any common sense know there are 20mil plus illegals and that doesn’t include all the family members they will bring into the US after amnesty is enacted. Next, why is it Xenophobia when we are just trying to protect our country and protect our way of life. Hell, blacks will be the ones hurt the worst after amnesty. Lastly, Mexico and many of the countries these illegals come from actually have laws in place to maintain the “racial/ethnic” makeup of their country, thus not too many non-Hispanic immigrants, guess that’s fair, right?

Feb 11, 2014 2:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

To techritter, Number one your numbers sound very low, sounds like you have listened to the Dems about how few illegals are in the USA, most people with any common sense know there are 20mil plus illegals and that doesn’t include all the family members they will bring into the US after amnesty is enacted. Next, why is it Xenophobia when we are just trying to protect our country and protect our way of life. Hell, blacks will be the ones hurt the worst after amnesty. Lastly, Mexico and many of the countries these illegals come from actually have laws in place to maintain the “racial/ethnic” makeup of their country, thus not too many non-Hispanic immigrants, guess that’s fair, right?

Feb 11, 2014 2:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

To techritter, Number one your numbers sound very low, sounds like you have listened to the Dems about how few illegals are in the USA, most people with any common sense know there are 20mil plus illegals and that doesn’t include all the family members they will bring into the US after amnesty is enacted. Next, why is it Xenophobia when we are just trying to protect our country and protect our way of life. Hell, blacks will be the ones hurt the worst after amnesty. Lastly, Mexico and many of the countries these illegals come from actually have laws in place to maintain the “racial/ethnic” makeup of their country, thus not too many non-Hispanic immigrants, guess that’s fair, right?

Feb 11, 2014 2:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

To techritter, Number one your numbers sound very low, sounds like you have listened to the Dems about how few illegals are in the USA, most people with any common sense know there are 20mil plus illegals and that doesn’t include all the family members they will bring into the US after amnesty is enacted. Next, why is it Xenophobia when we are just trying to protect our country and protect our way of life. Hell, blacks will be the ones hurt the worst after amnesty. Lastly, Mexico and many of the countries these illegals come from actually have laws in place to maintain the “racial/ethnic” makeup of their country, thus not too many non-Hispanic immigrants, guess that’s fair, right?

Feb 11, 2014 2:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

InMyView, You must be an ignorant person as apparently many people want to move to Switzerland, that’s the problem. If you look at the facts, Switzerland is usually rated in the top 2 or 3 countries as best to live in. The Swiss have great educational systems & healthcare, but they are being overrun by foreigners. I know, my oldest child lives there. The school systems are being forced to spend more and more money on these immigrants because they usually don’t speak German/French/Italian, so lots of money to teach them, next the vast majority of these immigrants do not hold education and work ethnic as a big part of their culture/lives, thus you have many that get left behind and many immigrants that get on welfare. Why should a country be forced to destroy itself to bring foreigners in and take care of them? It seems to me that the only countries that get attacked for controlling their immigration are countries of white European heritage, why? The vast, vast majority of countries control immigration as what is best the country, not as a welfare service for the world. China controls the immigration there, Japan does, Middle Eastern Countries, Islamic countries, Mexico, Central & South American countries control there immigration, but yet no one calls them racist, even though most of their policies do have a specific racial/ethnic component in them. The countries that these immigrants come from control their borders, so why shouldn’t white European based countries. Oh that’s right, only whites can be racist, correct…BS…. Go to Africa and see how whites get treated, go to the middle east, go to Central/South America and see how the whites get treated by the majority country population.

Feb 11, 2014 3:04am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

If a popular vote were held in the USA about controlling immigration, it would pass with a much greater percentage. Our “real” unemployment rate is 15%, with the unemployment rate for the low skill job workers at maybe double that number, so why in the hell would we want to add 11mil plus people looking for jobs? Makes no sense unless you look at the reasons this is being pushed in the US: 1. Democrats want amnesty because the people legalized would vote 9 to 1 for Dems, why because these people believe in the welfare state, which is the Dems biggest vote buying program. 2. Big businesses want amnesty because they want a free flow of low cost labor. If there are 5 people for every job available these businesses can keep labor cost much lower when compared to a 2 people for every job rate.

Amnesty will increase crime, decrease our school performance, increase cost tremendously for all social welfare programs (welfare, food stamps, free medical care), and make more and more of America look as though it’s a third world country (look at Los Angeles/Phoenix). Amnesty has no good value for the American people as a whole, the only groups that gain from amnesty are the Democrats for votes, the large corporations for low cost labor and the illegals & their families in their home country. So tell me, does it make sense for the American taxpayers fund new votes for Democrats, to fund low priced labor for corporations? NOOOOOOO. FYI, it has been shown over and over that these new “legals” do not hold the USA in high esteem. They don’t hold the same things as important that we do. So you make the choice add 11-25million newly legal immigrants and get ready to pay for them, if you pay taxes, as only 1/2 of us actually do pay federal taxes, or we kick these illegals out and make them go thru the legal process, just like other immigrants. One more thing our government doesn’t want us to know, but the amnesty program will not be able to positively identify whom we are letting in and it is already know as FACT that we have had many possible terrorist cross into America as illegals. Legalize them and they are much more able to access important sites, get jobs on military bases, etc. NOT TOO SMART.

Feb 11, 2014 3:21am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

If a popular vote were held in the USA about controlling immigration, it would pass with a much greater percentage. Our “real” unemployment rate is 15%, with the unemployment rate for the low skill job workers at maybe double that number, so why in the hell would we want to add 11mil plus people looking for jobs? Makes no sense unless you look at the reasons this is being pushed in the US: 1. Democrats want amnesty because the people legalized would vote 9 to 1 for Dems, why because these people believe in the welfare state, which is the Dems biggest vote buying program. 2. Big businesses want amnesty because they want a free flow of low cost labor. If there are 5 people for every job available these businesses can keep labor cost much lower when compared to a 2 people for every job rate.

Amnesty will increase crime, decrease our school performance, increase cost tremendously for all social welfare programs (welfare, food stamps, free medical care), and make more and more of America look as though it’s a third world country (look at Los Angeles/Phoenix). Amnesty has no good value for the American people as a whole, the only groups that gain from amnesty are the Democrats for votes, the large corporations for low cost labor and the illegals & their families in their home country. So tell me, does it make sense for the American taxpayers fund new votes for Democrats, to fund low priced labor for corporations? NOOOOOOO. FYI, it has been shown over and over that these new “legals” do not hold the USA in high esteem. They don’t hold the same things as important that we do. So you make the choice add 11-25million newly legal immigrants and get ready to pay for them, if you pay taxes, as only 1/2 of us actually do pay federal taxes, or we kick these illegals out and make them go thru the legal process, just like other immigrants. One more thing our government doesn’t want us to know, but the amnesty program will not be able to positively identify whom we are letting in and it is already know as FACT that we have had many possible terrorist cross into America as illegals. Legalize them and they are much more able to access important sites, get jobs on military bases, etc. NOT TOO SMART.

Feb 11, 2014 3:21am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

If a popular vote were held in the USA about controlling immigration, it would pass with a much greater percentage. Our “real” unemployment rate is 15%, with the unemployment rate for the low skill job workers at maybe double that number, so why in the hell would we want to add 11mil plus people looking for jobs? Makes no sense unless you look at the reasons this is being pushed in the US: 1. Democrats want amnesty because the people legalized would vote 9 to 1 for Dems, why because these people believe in the welfare state, which is the Dems biggest vote buying program. 2. Big businesses want amnesty because they want a free flow of low cost labor. If there are 5 people for every job available these businesses can keep labor cost much lower when compared to a 2 people for every job rate.

Amnesty will increase crime, decrease our school performance, increase cost tremendously for all social welfare programs (welfare, food stamps, free medical care), and make more and more of America look as though it’s a third world country (look at Los Angeles/Phoenix). Amnesty has no good value for the American people as a whole, the only groups that gain from amnesty are the Democrats for votes, the large corporations for low cost labor and the illegals & their families in their home country. So tell me, does it make sense for the American taxpayers fund new votes for Democrats, to fund low priced labor for corporations? NOOOOOOO. FYI, it has been shown over and over that these new “legals” do not hold the USA in high esteem. They don’t hold the same things as important that we do. So you make the choice add 11-25million newly legal immigrants and get ready to pay for them, if you pay taxes, as only 1/2 of us actually do pay federal taxes, or we kick these illegals out and make them go thru the legal process, just like other immigrants. One more thing our government doesn’t want us to know, but the amnesty program will not be able to positively identify whom we are letting in and it is already know as FACT that we have had many possible terrorist cross into America as illegals. Legalize them and they are much more able to access important sites, get jobs on military bases, etc. NOT TOO SMART.

Feb 11, 2014 3:21am EST  --  Report as abuse
Am_Right71 wrote:

If a popular vote were held in the USA about controlling immigration, it would pass with a much greater percentage. Our “real” unemployment rate is 15%, with the unemployment rate for the low skill job workers at maybe double that number, so why in the hell would we want to add 11mil plus people looking for jobs? Makes no sense unless you look at the reasons this is being pushed in the US: 1. Democrats want amnesty because the people legalized would vote 9 to 1 for Dems, why because these people believe in the welfare state, which is the Dems biggest vote buying program. 2. Big businesses want amnesty because they want a free flow of low cost labor. If there are 5 people for every job available these businesses can keep labor cost much lower when compared to a 2 people for every job rate.

Amnesty will increase crime, decrease our school performance, increase cost tremendously for all social welfare programs (welfare, food stamps, free medical care), and make more and more of America look as though it’s a third world country (look at Los Angeles/Phoenix). Amnesty has no good value for the American people as a whole, the only groups that gain from amnesty are the Democrats for votes, the large corporations for low cost labor and the illegals & their families in their home country. So tell me, does it make sense for the American taxpayers fund new votes for Democrats, to fund low priced labor for corporations? NOOOOOOO. FYI, it has been shown over and over that these new “legals” do not hold the USA in high esteem. They don’t hold the same things as important that we do. So you make the choice add 11-25million newly legal immigrants and get ready to pay for them, if you pay taxes, as only 1/2 of us actually do pay federal taxes, or we kick these illegals out and make them go thru the legal process, just like other immigrants. One more thing our government doesn’t want us to know, but the amnesty program will not be able to positively identify whom we are letting in and it is already know as FACT that we have had many possible terrorist cross into America as illegals. Legalize them and they are much more able to access important sites, get jobs on military bases, etc. NOT TOO SMART.

Feb 11, 2014 3:21am EST  --  Report as abuse
eastwood42 wrote:

Sods —– Law.
February.—- 2014.

For almost two decades we have strived to get justice for the injustice we have suffered at the hands of a world renowned bank— PICTET & CIE. BANK.

Two yorkshiremen both running their own small family businesses trying to resolve the problem by taking all the correct legal procedures to recover their monies.

The matter was raised in Parliament – twice– the FSA investigated the matter concluding that PICTET had rogues operating in their London Bank — but the rogues had left —saying no one left to prosecute.??? —– so there.

We then approached the Financial Ombudsman Service. (FOS) — our case was dealt with by seven different people —- then our numerous E-Mails were ignored — nobody would speak to us ——-so there.

We then asked the SFO ( Serious Fraud Office.) to investigate our case —- the criteria of our case ticked all their boxes. — we were instructed not to send them any documents/evidence.—— in fact they wrote to us advising us to go to the Citizen’s Advice Bureau.(CAB.)

Richard Alderman the SFO boss —- who responded to our letter was the same man who would not investigate the “ Madoff” scandal or the “Libor” fiasco.
The MP’s committee —- said he was sloppy— and the SFO was run like “ Fred Karno’s Circus” —– it was an office of fraud.—– so there.

Our M.P. approached our local Chief Constable to investigate—– he was called—- Sir Norman Bettison— Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police —- a force that made “ Dad’s Army” look like the S.A.S. They were inept – corrupt —malicious — from top to bottom. We were criminally dealt with by the Forces Solicitor—- the Head of the Economic Crime Unit —-and the Chief Constable —– so there.

We were then advised to pass our complaint against West Yorkshire Police to the I.P.C.C. – which we did — they advised us to make our complaint to —- the West Yorkshire Police — we did with reluctance — all we got was abuse and obfuscation. —– so there.

Sir Norman Bettison —- The Forces solicitor— and the Head of the Economic Crime —- have all been removed from their posts and facing criminal allegations.
—— so there.

We even sought justice through the Courts — culminating in a visit to the Court of Appeal-London.— On leaving the Courts of Appeal that day our barrister a “rising star” informed us — that if that was Justice then you can keep it. He quit the law and moved to Canada —– so there.

A few years later we learned that one of the judges in our case at the Court of Appeal was related to a senior executive of the Pictet Bank —–so there.

Pictet & Cie .Bank — voted private bank of the year 2013.
Ivan Pictet —- Voted banker of the year 2012. —- the senior partner — lied on numerous occasions and had documents destroyed — also said genuine documents were forgeries. —– so there.

Ivan Pictet in Oct. 2013 —- Given the Legion of Honour — but saying that —- honours were given to Hitler — Eichmann — Mussolini —Franco — he’s in fitting company. —-so there.

MONTY RAPHAEL.Q.C. — Peters & Peters.London. They were the banks lawyers.
Monty Raphael.Q.C. along with Ivan Pictet withheld crucial documents requested by the High Court —- the FSA —- and the police Fraud Squad. —-so there.

Monty Raphael.Q.C. became an Honorary Queens Counsellor in March. 2012.
Monty Raphael.Q.C. became a Master of the Bench in Nov.2012.
An expert in Fraud —the Doyen of Fraud Lawyers. —– so there.

This says a lot about Banks — the consensus of opinion is that they are highly paid “crooks” —- no wonder they voted Ivan Pictet banker of the year.

It appears that crimes in the “establishment.” are honoured by their peers.
“HONOURS AMONG THIEVES.”

Full Story.—- “google or Yahoo”

Insert.

Ivan Pictet.Banker.
Monty Raphael.Q.C.
Ivan Pictet/Monty Raphael.

Feb 11, 2014 8:21am EST  --  Report as abuse
eastwood42 wrote:

Update — Feb. 2014.

Pictet & Cie Bank —- List of Crimes.

1996 —– F.S.A— Breach in London.

2003 —– F.S.A. — States rogues operating in Pictet’s London office. Ivan Pictet states that documents were forgeries but were later proved to be genuine in the British Courts. He had documents destroyed in their London office –hoping to hide the crimes.

2007 .- – - The Securities and Exchange Surveillance issued a recommendation that the Prime Minister and The Commissioner of the FSA to take disciplinary action against Pictet Asset Management – Japan Ltd.

2008 .– Dec. – Pictet Bank state – ” We have never chosen any funds linked to Madoff.

2011 – - – Madoff Trustees sue Pictet & Cie. Bank for $156 Million.

2011- – - Pictet & Cie Bank abetted a Bribery Scheme – Oil company sues Pictet for $350Million

2012 – - – April – Geneva Bank Pictet used in Offshore Tax Scheme. ( USA.)

2012 — – June. — Published in Anglo INFO .Geneva.— USA Trust Fund Investors were sent false and fraudulent documents by Pictet Bank in order to collect large fees. ( Like MADOFF)
Even after the SEC in the USA uncovered the fraud Pictet continued to charge fees and drain whatever was left in these accounts. Estimated that $90 million lost in this Pictet Ponzi scheme.

2012 – - – July. — De – Spiegel. — states – Pictet Bank uses a letterbox company in Panama and a tax loophole involving investments in London to gain German millionaires as clients.

2012 – - – August —- German Opposition Leader accuses Swiss Banks of “organised crime.”

2013 — Jan.— Swiss MP’ table motion to freeze Tiab Mahmud’s assets of ” criminal origins”
held in Swiss banks – $18 million held in 5 accounts at Pictet & Cie. Bank. Bahamas.

Ironically the Pictet & Cie.Bank partners are bigger criminals than the criminals who have accounts in the their bank.

The bank is now seeking to re-structure — to cut the partners liability – hoping to off load their decades of criminal responsibilty – and move onwards to carry out new crimes. The Germans are right — the bankers should go to prison if found guilty of financial crimes..

Both Ivan Pictet and Monty Raphael.Q.C. conspired to withhold crucial documents requested by the High Court – the FSA — and the Police Fraud Squad.

Written Parliamentary Questions received by the table office ..

(1) To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking to ensure that Swiss Banks such as Pictet & Cie do not evade criminal prosecution under EU law even when the illegal act is committed by a London based subsidiary.

(2)To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking to protect the rights of UK citizens who seek redress following criminal activities by Swiss banks with subsidiary offices located in London.

Quote. ( America’s Top Lawyer .)
You can be the richest man in the world with the best lawyers that money can buy but you cannot win against a man who has got nothing left to lose and is telling the truth.

*** We note that there has been a sharp increase in Peters & Peters partners leaving to go to other practices. Moving does not alleviate them of any responsibility from any illegalities that may have occurred at Peters & Peters during their partnership tenure. From 1999 onwards.

The consensus of opinion is the Pictet & Cie should be prosecuted , and that their U.K. banking licence should be taken away.

Their Solicitors at Peters & Peters .London “ struck off and prosecuted..”

*** Started campaign — June 6th.2008.
5years —- approx 10 .5 million e-mails – - – but still no writs, injunctions or threats of litigation – – - WHY – - – because it is all true.

*** . The bigger they are — the harder they fall.!!! In America —- they would have all been in prison for the last seven years.

Feb 2013,— Pictet & Cie Bank Partners remove their unlimited liability.They realise that all their personal wealth is at risk , the people they have conned might want their money back.

Full Story.***
. ” Google ” or ” Yahoo” .

Insert– ( Charles Pictet. Banker.
Insert– ( Ivan Pictet.Banker.
Insert– ( Jacques de Saussure.Banker.
Insert– ( Nicolas Pictet. Banker.
Insert– ( Jean-Francois Demole.Banker.
Insert — ( Philippe Bertherat. Banker.
Insert– ( Renaud de Planta. Banker.

Update. Jan. 24th. 2014.
Over the last three years we posted the following on hundreds of sites . –

*** Were currently waiting for the West Yorkshire Police ;-
(1) Chief Constable . Sir Norman Bettison
(2) Forces Solicitor. Mike Percival.
(3) Head of Economic Crime Unit. Det Chief Inspector. Steven Taylor.
-to see if they continue to cover up this case like the FSA. – “ watch this space.”

**** We can now state that all the above have been removed from their posts. All three facing criminal allegations.
**** These three senior police officials assisted in covering up the crimes carried out by Pictet & Cie Bank and it’s lawyers.

Feb 11, 2014 8:21am EST  --  Report as abuse
eastwood42 wrote:

Swiss Bank Accounts. 2014.

Is your monies safe in these accounts —- definitely NOT.
Would you get your money back if every body decided to withdraw all their accounts – NO WAY.
Economic Experts say that there would only enough money to repay 50% of their clients.
Are you going to be in the 50% — that loose your money.– Get it out NOW.

2012 — – June. — Published in Anglo INFO .Geneva.— USA Trust Fund Investors were sent false and fraudulent documents by Pictet Bank.Switzerland. in order to collect large fees. ( Like MADOFF) —Even after the SEC in the USA uncovered the fraud Pictet continued to charge fees and drain whatever was left in these accounts. Estimated that $90,000,000 million lost in this Pictet Ponzi scheme.

2012 – - – July. — De – Spiegel. — states – Pictet Bank uses a letterbox company in
Panama and a tax loophole involving investments in London to gain
German millionaires as clients.

2012 – - – August —- German Opposition Leader accuses Swiss Banks of “organised crime.”

All the fines that crooked Swiss banks have incurred in the last few years exceeds £75.Billion.
It is also calculated that the secrecy ” agreements” with regards to tax evation by their clients will cost the banks another £450 Billion.( paid out of your monies.)

The banks are panicking — the are quickly restructuring their banks —- from partnerships –
to ” LIMITED COMPANIES.” —– this will probably mean that in the future — they could
pay you only 10% of your monies ” if you are one of the lucky ones” —- and it be legal.

Feb 11, 2014 8:22am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.