California professor charged for allegedly shoving anti-abortion protester

Comments (17)
imskeptical wrote:

I don’t know if I would shove them, but I sure as hell wouldn’t ride the elevator with them either.

Mar 22, 2014 1:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
WildBillWB wrote:

She should have ripped her fetus from the womb and swung it at them by the ankles like a club while garroting the sixteen year old with the umbilical cord. I’ll betcha they’d have liked it more than their graphic images. Or she coulda just ignored them.

Mar 22, 2014 3:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Big2Tex wrote:

Favor all abortion on post birth baby killers. Why do the hedonistic progressives coddle to baby killers? It makes no sense. They will all vote progressive if allowed to be born so they are killing their own future low information voters.

Mar 22, 2014 12:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Laborman wrote:

But the anti-abortion folks LOVE it when one of theirs shoots and kills a doctor.

Mar 22, 2014 12:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Laborman wrote:

But the anti-abortion folks LOVE it when one of theirs shoots and kills a doctor.

Mar 22, 2014 12:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:

Obviously Miller Young has no love for the US Constitution, nor it’s protections of fee speech! I guess only those who promote ABORTIONS are entitled to those rights, while any folks with opposing views are fair game for strong arm bullying.

Nice going Mom (soon to be), I hope you don’t teach your own values to your unfortunate offspring.

Mar 22, 2014 12:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Kiljoy616 wrote:

Useless people with only one way of thinking. They should mind their own business and no there is no God or Heaven so stop thinking you have hidden knowledge. She should have upper cut her and send her to her delusional gods.

Mar 22, 2014 12:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
xnavygunner1 wrote:

Just another leftist thug.

Mar 22, 2014 2:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Big2Tex wrote:

Oh, right Kiljoy616, condemn those one way thinkers. Seen any in your mirror lately?

Mar 22, 2014 2:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Randy549 wrote:

Hopefully she will be convicted and have it affect her job security and future job prospects, if it hasn’t already.

Mar 22, 2014 2:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RetiredHappy wrote:

If I’d have been the professor, I’d have asked the protesters for their names and addresses, told them that I’d gladly carry the pregnancy to term if the protesters wouldn’t mind helping to share the expense of raising, clothing, feeding and educating the child. Most anti-abortionists are against birth control, yet they fail to realize that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Mar 22, 2014 5:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Immolate wrote:

@RetiredHappy – I’m against the killing of liberals. Does that mean I should be required to financially support them? And what makes you think that most anti-abortionists are against birth control? The Catholic church is, but most other denominations either have no opinion or support it, and even those faiths that oppose birth control don’t speak for the practices of their members. I think you should change your moniker to “RetiredButStillLearningTheBasics”.

Mar 24, 2014 9:00am EDT  --  Report as abuse
frigger611 wrote:

Leftists are stupid, intolerant, brutish people. Free speech exists as a concept to protect opposing and controversial viewpoints. If everyone agreed on everything, there’d be no need for it.

In the old days when people got “offended” they would look the other way, or change the channel. This beast of a woman juts goes to show how far we’ve fallen. Universities now have all sorts of “speech codes” that restrict speech and open discussion. Precisely opposite of academia’s true mission.

Of course the speech codes are designed to promote “correct” idea, i.e. progressivism, while limiting conservative values, tradition, and Christianity.

The university system is not just a joke, it’s a pox.

Mar 24, 2014 11:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
muzjik wrote:

“She added that she was especially offended by the protesters’ cause because of her focus of study”

You failed to report that the “focus” of her work is pornography and sex work.

Mar 24, 2014 12:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ertdfg wrote:

DavidinNY, they were in the “free spe3ech zone” where the campus forced them to be… and you disagree with letting them be there too?

So free speech NOWHERE and assault anyone anywhere for saying something you don’t like?

They were “terrorists” for having free speech in a free speech zone?

Dear lord Orwell couldn’t come up with something this stupid, and he TRIED.

Mar 24, 2014 1:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
muzjik wrote:

After the Allies liberated the Nazi death camps, Life and other publications printed photos. The thinking was that no one would believe the horrors found there without visual evidence.
No one would have supported an irate person beating up a magazine vender for displaying the magazines at his newsstand.
Don’t hate the messenger.

Mar 24, 2014 2:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
muzjik wrote:

Why are you not allowing comments…except those that abuse the pro-life teen-ager?

Mar 24, 2014 5:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.