Supreme Court declines to hear Iowa campaign finance challenge

Comments (2)
njglea wrote:

Do not be fooled. Mr. Roberts and his “conservative” gang are just getting started. Next up – further trying to curtail a woman’s right to choose what she does with her own body by picking it Roe v Wade and making women criminals when they have back alley abortions. Unless we stop them, of course, by kicking republicans/liberterians/tea party members and people posing as democrats and independents out of office. The vast majority of us do not want their religious/corporate radicalism to run America.

Apr 07, 2014 10:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
COindependent wrote:

@nyglea But how does rationalize that unions can make contributions and other entities cannot? It’s as if unions have privileged status when it comes to campaign contributions.

One would think that any judge with a reasonable amount of common sense would see this as being grossly inequitable.

Apr 07, 2014 12:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.