Hillary Clinton says she's 'thinking' about 2016 White House run

Comments (12)

The old gal should retire and leave ruling to younger people who actually understand the needs of people and the environment. Hillary has no ideas or imagination that fit the 21st Century.

Apr 08, 2014 11:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Cyberblunt wrote:

RudyH, you are right.

Apr 09, 2014 8:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Lyn4U wrote:

Hollary should consider she’d be the Commander in Chief…. not an easy role considering all the terrorism, Syria, etc.

Apr 09, 2014 8:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
4825 wrote:

I agree, she is a bit old for the job.

Apr 09, 2014 8:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
The_Traveler wrote:

“The old gal should retire and leave ruling to younger people who actually understand the needs of people and the environment. Hillary has no ideas or imagination that fit the 21st Century.”

Old age and experience will always overcome youth and exuberance.

Apr 09, 2014 9:00am EDT  --  Report as abuse
lensmanb wrote:

Think about Benghazi and then think about how our government lies to us today. Do you really think it will get any better with her? She should retire back to Iowa.

Apr 09, 2014 10:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
morbas wrote:

Go Hillary Go…
It will be good to have you back….

morbas(i)

Apr 09, 2014 11:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:

She doesn’t differ significantly from the fear mongers we have had since Kennedy. Suggesting she is not a liberal, but rather a corporate facist as the rest are. Also, it’s not clear to me that a president could do any good now, since the control of the country is in the hands of a few wealthy people who use the government to do their bidding. Primarily the military and CIA are working for industry and may have in fact completed a slow moving coup in stealth mode. The American people are too stupid to realise what reality exists so this is a possibility. Add also that most americans are cruel facist like people as they are trained in our educational system and it seems almost likely that we are only a democratic republic in name and not actuality. Much like we are not really “free market” capitalists. The number of misrepresentations and lies circulated in the media expose their role too.

Apr 09, 2014 11:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:

Oh, I should mention. Her success at winning will largely be associated with who the republicans put up against her. More people know of the facists within the republican party and the falseness of the tea baggers. They also know who Hillary is. She will win if the people perceive that the republican candidate is more of the same regarding the attacks on freedom and democracy, and the loyalty to the wealthy only. Personally I can’t see any possibility for the GOP unless they somehow become honest about their facist agenda and the american people get behind it because they like the sadistic nature and being slaves to cruel masters. Knowing the masochism of the religious, I think that is somewhat of a possibilty. We often rant on the lessons of Germany and facism, but we are more and more like them, and I am sure there are still true believers in Hitlers cause, actually, in both the democratic and republican parties.

Apr 09, 2014 11:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Zymbat wrote:

@brotherkenny4, I’m not sure what the point of your rambling was… face the facts man, she is a bit old for the job.

Apr 09, 2014 11:51am EDT  --  Report as abuse
The_Traveler wrote:

Zymbat posted: “… face the facts man, she is a bit old for the job.”

At 66? Hardly. Reagan took the oath at 69, went 2 terms and even survived an assassination attempt. Most folks consider him to have been a good President.

Job discrimination based on age is illegal in the US. Even for the job of President.

Apr 09, 2014 2:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
BATTMAN wrote:

Think about Benghazi?? Think about all the dead and wounded, brought to you from dubya & Dickless cheney!

Apr 09, 2014 2:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.