Special Report: In Chernobyl, a disaster persists

Comments (3)
Variation wrote:

Great Article.

Mar 15, 2011 11:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Syllogizer wrote:

This point needs to be repeated a lot, since there is still a lot of confusion about it. Too many newspaper articles (and website articles) keep mentioning Fukushima and Chernobyl in the same breath.

But bad as it is, Fukushima is nowhere near as bad as Chernobyl, nor is it likely to get that bad.

Why, as it is, it is about on the same level as Three Mile Island, maybe a little worse, but not much, despite what the French say.

Mar 15, 2011 4:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Fedorets wrote:

it’s a good time to audit closely the current status of 4th unit of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant.. and the status of the project: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Safe_Confinement

Mar 17, 2011 2:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.