Trade court rules against sex-bias claim

Thu Jul 3, 2008 6:08pm EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. trade court on Thursday rejected an importer's claim that differing tariff rates for men's gloves amounted to unconstitutional sex discrimination, in a case closely watched by the fashion industry.

The U.S. Court of International Trade dismissed a challenge to the tariffs by Totes-Isotoner Corp. The court said the importer had failed to show the government intended to discriminate by gender when it set tariffs for men's gloves that were higher than for gloves "for other persons."

"The tariff provisions at issue do not require that the imported goods be actually sold to or used by people of one sex or some age category," the ruling said.

It said the company must allege the differing tariffs disadvantage one sex as a whole, or disproportionately.

The case has been considered a test case for the fashion industry and other importers had been expected to press similar complaints if the Totes-Isotoner case was successful.

(Reporting by Randall Mikkelsen, editing by Todd Eastham)

 
People wearing disposable masks attend a campaign promoting the use of face masks to prevent infection by the H1N1 flu virus, at a hospital in Nonthaburi province, on the outskirts of Bangkok, July 13, 2009.  REUTERS/Chaiwat Subprasom
New flu resembles feared 1918 virus

The new H1N1 influenza virus bears a disturbing resemblance to the virus strain that caused the 1918 flu pandemic, with a greater ability to infect the lungs than common seasonal flu viruses, according to a new study.  Full Article | Full Coverage 

Photo

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Join the Reuters Consumer Insight Panel and help us get to know you better

Join the Reuters Consumer Insight Panel and help us get to know you better