Unions move toward health-care reform deal

By Nick Carey

CHICAGO (Reuters) - As rising health-care costs hurt workers and retirees alike, America's trade unions are seen inching toward a broad-sweeping agreement with U.S. corporations on health-care reform.

"There is a growing recognition among unions that they can't count on health insurance forever," said Joe Minarik, director of research at the Committee for Economic Development, a Washington-based business lobby.

"Like many corporations, the unions know a meaningful solution requires working together," Minarik said.

The CED is part of the Better Health Care Together coalition, an unlikely mix of major companies such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and unions that are usually at loggerheads on labor issues. It was set up to find a compromise solution on universal health care that is palatable to both business and labor.

Specific proposals on the ground are thin, but universal coverage is expected to be funded jointly by employers, employees and the U.S. government -- creating a solution that falls somewhere between the current private sector dominated U.S. system and Canada's state-funded health-care program.

Although unions have long publicly supported universal coverage, during the last abortive attempt at U.S. health-care reform in 1994 led by then-first lady Hillary Clinton some unions focused more on defending their own hard-won private benefits than backing universal coverage, said Jacob Hacker, a political science professor at Yale University.

"For decades, unions used health-care benefits to promote membership," said Hacker, whose 2006 book, "The Great Risk Shift," examines the erosion of financial stability for American families. "But times have changed."

Americans have seen double-digit annual health insurance cost increases in the past decade as employers have passed on some of the burden. The National Coalition of Health Care estimates the average annual premium for an employer health-care plan for a family of four is nearly $11,500. The employee pays $3,000 of that total, the bipartisan group says.