UK-based law firm Eversheds is in merger talks
with U.S. peer Sutherland Asbill & Brennan in the latest attempt
by the British firm to secure a U.S. tie-up.
The two firms' partners are due to vote on a proposal before
the end of the year to create a combined firm, called Eversheds
Sutherland, which would employ 2,300 lawyers across 61 offices
in 29 countries, Eversheds said on Tuesday.
Eversheds' Chief Executive Bryan Hughes outlined plans in
2012 to become a "global leader" by 2020, partly to better serve
the global needs of clients, and the firm has been openly keen
to clinch a U.S. merger over the last two years.
But talks with U.S.-based Foley & Lardner broke off last
"Joining forces with Sutherland will give each firm's
clients a global platform and we will be discussing the proposal
with our partners positively in the coming weeks," Hughes said
Eversheds, built up over the last 20 years from small,
national practices, has a core practice area that includes real
estate, company commercial law and consulting. Sutherland,
established in 1924 as a tax firm, also focuses on areas such as
energy, financial services, intellectual property and
Profit per equity partner at the two firms is similar.
Eversheds, which has more than 500 partners and almost 2,000
lawyers, had a revenue of 406 million pounds ($507 million) in
the last year, while profits per equity partner (PEP) came in at
Atlanta-based Sutherland, which also has offices in Austin,
Houston, New York, Sacramento, California and Washington DC and
employs 170 partners and more than 200 additional lawyers, had a
revenue of $300 million in 2015 and equity partners earned just
over $1 million.
The profitability falls short of that at London's "magic
circle" of top law firms, such as Freshfields Bruckhaus
Deringer, Clifford Chance and Allen & Overy, where equity
partners earned between 1.2 million and 1.47 million pounds
($1.5-1.84 million) last year. A record 11 law firms reported an
average PEP of 1 million pounds for last year.
Eversheds said the new firm would be overseen by a global
board with equal representation from both legal practices. The
two firms said it would be inappropriate to comment further at
this stage of discussions.