• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

UPDATE 1-M&T Q4 profit up 34 percent

Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:45am EST

Stocks

   

* Q4 net income $137 million

* Q4 EPS $1.04 vs Street view 87 cents

NEW YORK, Jan 20 (Reuters) - U.S. mid-Atlantic regional bank M&T Bank Corp (MTB.N) reported a better-than-expected quarterly profit on Wednesday, as net charge-offs for loans decreased and it trimmed its provision for credit losses.

The company, which counts Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRKb.N) (BRKa.N) among its investors and operates about 800 branches, posted fourth-quarter net income of $137 million, or $1.04 per share, compared with a profit of $102.2 million, or 92 cents per share, in the year-ago quarter.

Analysts, on average, had expected M&T to post a profit of 87 cents per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

U.S. regional banks have seen their interest margins squeezed as they compete for deposits and face credit losses due to loans gone bad due to the financial crisis. (Reporting by Clare Baldwin, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)



More from Reuters

Protestors wait outside the U.S. Capitol as the U.S. Senate prepares to vote on U.S. President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul in Washington

States take aim to block plan

As the Congress once again rallies to pass healthcare reform legislation, momentum is growing in many states to pass laws to block the changes.   Full Article 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gestures as she addresses her weekly news conference with Capitol Hill reporters, March 19, 2010. REUTERS/Hyungwon Kang

Momentum on healthcare bill

Democratic leaders pushed undecided House members for support and voiced growing confidence they will win a close vote on the sweeping overhaul.  Full Article | Video 

 A campsite at a homeless tent city in Sacramento California March 15, 2009. REUTERS/ Max Whittaker
John Kemp:

Be careful what you wish for

The yuan debate is exposing dangerous illiteracy among policymakers: Despite the jobs boost for Americans, it would also cut our living standards. How?  Commentary