• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

U.S. federal judge weighs DVD copying case

SAN FRANCISCO
Thu May 21, 2009 9:41pm EDT
Shopkeepers wait for customers at a store selling pirated DVDs in Beijing April 24, 2007. REUTERS/Claro Cortes IV

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A Federal District Court judge in California weighed arguments in a contentious DVD copyright case between Hollywood movie companies and RealNetworks Inc on Thursday, but did not indicate when she might rule.

U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel is expected to issue a written decision on whether sales of RealNetworks' software that allows people to make backups of their DVDs on a home computer -- which she temporarily halted in October -- can resume.

Her decision will come after hearing more evidence on whether the company violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 and the license it had with the DVD Copy Control Association and will indicate what she expects will happen if the issue goes to trial.

The movie companies argued that "RealDVD" software should be banned because it violates copyright law and agreed-upon encryption methods.

"Real reduces the cost of a DVD to zero if you borrow it or $3.99 if you rent it," said Motion Picture Association of America lawyer Bart Williams, quoting from earlier testimony.

RealNetworks said that DVD owners have a "fair use" right to make copies of their own DVDs, but said on Thursday the software did enable sharing among friends.

"Those are cumbersome ways to make copies and those are not the markets we are targeting, but yes, it can happen," said Don Scott, a lawyer for the Seattle-based digital media company.

The company said it would be willing to rewrite portions of the code to address specific concerns.

Scott said the studios' reluctance to help RealNetworks mark DVDs or create other protections was fear of losing market share.

The studios sell their own backup copies of movies, but said that RealNetworks violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act because it does not hold the copyrights.

"This case is about Real trying to take money that is not theirs," Williams said. "When you buy a movie, you buy a copy of the movie, not the movie itself."

If the injunction against RealNetworks' software stands, it could bolster studio sales of digital backup copies.

If it falls, it could establish a beachhead for software that transfers movies from DVDs to hard drives, opening the door for many companies to sell software and devices that can store and organize movies from DVDs.

RealNetworks CEO Rob Glaser said in early May the company spent about $6 million in the first quarter on the lawsuit.

The studios would not comment on how much they have spent.

Movie companies in the case are owned by Walt Disney Co, Time Warner Inc, Sony Corp, News Corp, Viacom Inc, and General Electric Co. They were joined by the Motion Picture Association of America and the DVD Copy Control Association.

A preliminary injunction would be in effect until the case is decided in a trial.

The case is RealNetworks, Inc. et al v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. et al in the Northern District Court of California, case number 3:08-cv-04548-MHP.

(Reporting by Clare Baldwin; Editing by Richard Chang)



More from Reuters

GMAC to get $3.5 billion more in government aid

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - GMAC Financial Services is expected to get about $3.5 billion in additional U.S. government aid to help the troubled lender absorb mortgage losses, a financial industry source familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

Maria Montero carries plastic products for quality control inspection at Blow Molded Plastics in Pawtucket, Rhode Island November 17, 2009.   REUTERS/Brian Snyder

Learning to survive and thrive

Small manufacturers in states like Alabama are taking a risk on innovation to compete with low-cost competition. It's working. The second installment in a three-part report.  Full Article 

Disgraced financier Bernard Madoff is escorted by police and photographed by the media as he departs U.S. Federal Court after a hearing in New York, January 5, 2009. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

I beg your pardon ...

Bernie Madoff became the poster boy of crooked investment schemes this year -- but he wasn't alone. Here's a look at the 10 most notorious cases of 2009.  Full Article