• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

FACTBOX-Pakistan political prospects as coalition cracks

ISLAMABAD
Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:49am EDT

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - The second biggest party in Pakistan's fractious ruling coalition has threatened to quit the alliance unless a decision is taken quickly to restore judges dismissed by former president Pervez Musharraf.

World

Former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, who leads the party, wants a fast decision in line with his demand all sacked judges be restored. He and his supporters are also unhappy the top party in the coalition seems to be dragging its feet on a commitment to strip the presidency of some of its powers.

The coalition is headed by the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) of assassinated former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, which said on Saturday it would nominate its leader and Bhutto's widower, Asif Ali Zardari, to replace Musharraf as president.

Following are some implications of the latest developments.

GENERAL ELECTION SCENARIOS

* The departure of Sharif's Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) from the coalition would not force an election, analysts say, as the PPP should be able to gather enough support to rule from independents and from parliamentarians who had backed Musharraf.

* However, Sharif looks set to gain in popularity by standing firm on principle on the judges, whose sacking was regarded as the major decision that turned public opinion against Musharraf. That could help make Sharif and his Pakistan Muslim League (N) party the favourites when an election is ultimately held.

BATTLE OVER JUDGES

* The PPP is reluctant to restore the judges, partly because of concern the deposed chief justice might take up challenges to an amnesty granted to Zardari and other party leaders from graft charges last year, analysts say.

* Before Musharraf sacked them the judges were also quite willing to challenge his government on the legality of various decisions, a tendency the PPP may not view with enthusiasm now that it effectively controls government.

BATTLE OVER THE PRESIDENCY

* Pakistan will hold a presidential election on September 6. Under the constitution members of the country's four provincial assemblies and the national parliament elect the new president.

* Sharif's PML (N) has shown no inclination to field its own candidate, who would have little chance in any case, but would like to make the presidency a ceremonial post after what it views as the Musharraf dictatorship. The PPP meanwhile is coy about whether and when it would agree to strip the presidency of such powers as being able to dissolve parliament.

* The stance of Sharif and his party is again likely to win popular points with those who saw the presidency's strong powers as enabling Musharraf's strongman rule.

ECONOMIC AND SECURITY IMPLICATIONS

* The various squabbles divert government attention from economic and security problems, critics say, to the dismay of investors and allies. Pakistani stocks and the rupee strengthened initially last week in hope Musharraf's resignation heralded an end to political uncertainty. But in the last three days of the weak they fell sharply, with traders citing the coalition's inability to get its act together as the main factor.

* An intensifying insurgency in Afghanistan is pressuring Pakistan to act quickly to stop Taliban attacks from sanctuaries on its side of the border and control other militants. Action against violent militants in just one area on Saturday saw 50 militants and 10 government soldiers killed.

However, some fear a tough stance spurs tit-for-tat suicide attacks. Pakistani Taliban said that was the motive for the most deadly strike yet against the military, which killed at least 67 people in blasts outside a defence industry complex on Thursday.

* Although taking blame now for political wrangling keeping the government from effectively tackling such issues, if it does leave the coalition Sharif's party avoids responsibility if the government subsequently fails to resolve them, quite possible considering their complexity.

(For a related story see PAKISTAN-POLITICS or double click on )

(Writing by Jerry Norton; Editing by Kamran Haider and David Fox)



More from Reuters

An image of U.S. President Barack Obama is seen in an exhibition at the Nobel Peace Centre in Oslo December 9, 2009. Two leading international human rights groups gave Obama mixed reviews on his human rights record on Wednesday, a day before he is slated to accept the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International urged Obama to use his acceptance speech on Thursday to renew U.S. leadership on human rights after its position was undermined by abuses committed during the Bush administration's war on terrorism. REUTERS/Chris Helgren

Copenhagen: What of Obama?

President Barack Obama’s decision to attend the climate talks in Copenhagen is said to show the White House is serious about pursuing a deal to curb global warming. What should Obama commit to on climate change? Share your views.  Full Article | Related Story 

     Tom Metzold, Vice President of Eaton Vance Management and Senior Portfolio Manager at Eaton Vance, speaks at the Reuters Global Media Summit in New York, December 9, 2009. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

    "Everything's not hunky-dory"

    Did the worst downturn in 70 years leave a permanent scar? Top money managers like Tom Metzold examine how a "new normal" will shape things to come.  Full Article 

    A crown in a file photo. REUTERS/File
    Special Report:

    No longer king of the hill

    When times were good, hedge fund managers could do what they wanted and people still lined up for a piece of the action. What will the post-crash, post-Madoff, post-Galleon hedge fund universe look like?  Full Article