EU powers challenge Iran nuclear answers to IAEA
VIENNA (Reuters) - Britain, France and Germany challenged Iran's answers to questions about its nuclear program accepted by the U.N. atomic watchdog and said Tehran would pay a price for further evasiveness and defiance.
Iran countered at an International Atomic Energy Agency governors meeting in Vienna that a recent IAEA report exonerated it of suspicions that it secretly sought to build atom bombs.
The Islamic Republic's IAEA ambassador said further U.N. Security Council sanctions adopted on Monday would have no effect on Iran's "exclusively peaceful nuclear activities".
But most on the 35-nation IAEA body, while recognizing Iran had provided information to ease some concerns about past activity, said Tehran had much more to do to clean its slate, including addressing what inspectors call serious intelligence indicating that it studied how to "weaponise" nuclear materials.
Iran says its uranium enrichment program is meant only to generate electricity. But its history of nuclear secrecy and curbs on IAEA inspections stoke fears it could turn to producing nuclear arms.
IAEA Director Mohamed ElBaradei told the governors on Monday his inspectors had clarified all but one remaining issue of nuclear proliferation concern in Iran. The rest were "no longer outstanding" and this was "obviously encouraging".
But Britain, France and Germany, who sponsored a third, tougher set of Security Council sanctions on Iran, adopted on Monday, cast Iran's recent actions in a more negative light.
"Over a wide range of issues on which the agency asked for clarification, the answers are less than satisfactory," they
said in a speech given by British IAEA Ambassador Simon Smith.
"In conclusion, (ElBaradei's) report leaves our three countries in no doubt that Iran's record in complying with these requirements remains abysmal," he said, referring to Security Council demands for a halt to nuclear work and full transparency about its program.
"CONSEQUENCES FOR NON-COOPERATION"
"We want to see Iran choose the cooperative path," he said, alluding to a 2006 world power offer of trade and technology benefits if Iran shelved sensitive enrichment efforts.
"As long as Iran's choice remains one of non-cooperation, we for our part will remain determined to demonstrate the costs and consequences of that choice," he added, alluding to sanctions.
ElBaradei said the "alleged weaponisation studies" remained a "serious concern" and Iran would be pressed to back up its flat denials with credible evidence, but he indicated Iran was becoming more transparent.
"None of our concern and dissatisfaction is a reflection of the work of (ElBaradei) and (his inspectors) in their earnest and impartial efforts to get satisfactory and convincing answers," Smith said on behalf of the "EU-3" powers.
He noted that the answers cited in ElBaradei's February 22 report were unverified, merely described as "consistent with" or "not inconsistent with" inspector findings.
"So these answers are not necessarily implausible, but not necessarily the truth," Smith said.
Western diplomats believe some "clarified" issues, including traces of bomb-grade uranium found in research labs -- which Iran said came with used parts imported from Pakistan -- are related to suspected weapons work in Iran.
Iran's ambassador said it had refuted the reports of covert atom bomb studies with documents that proved the intelligence was "fake and forged... and that is our final assessment".
"The resolution of all remaining issues is a turning point in our relations with the agency," Ali Asghar Soltanieh said.
But Western members of the board and even South Africa, a leader of a developing nation bloc to which Iran belongs, declared the Iranian nuclear dossier remained open.
(Editing by Tim Pearce)
